695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24709274)
1. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trading of dynamic interaural time and level difference cues and its effect on the auditory motion-onset response measured with electroencephalography.
Altmann CF; Ueda R; Bucher B; Furukawa S; Ono K; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():185-194. PubMed ID: 28756239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory lateralization in schizophrenia--mismatch negativity and behavioral evidence of a selective impairment in encoding interaural time cues.
Matthews N; Todd J; Budd TW; Cooper G; Michie PT
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):833-44. PubMed ID: 17317304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory Mismatch Negativity in Response to Changes of Counter-Balanced Interaural Time and Level Differences.
Altmann CF; Ueda R; Furukawa S; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():387. PubMed ID: 28729820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.
Higgins NC; McLaughlin SA; Rinne T; Stecker GC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):E7602-E7611. PubMed ID: 28827357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
Ross B
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated processing of spatial cues in human auditory cortex.
Salminen NH; Takanen M; Santala O; Lamminsalo J; Altoè A; Pulkki V
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():143-52. PubMed ID: 26074304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.
Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA; Eddins AC
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):737-748. PubMed ID: 31242052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of interaural time and level differences on the binaural interaction component of the 80 Hz auditory steady-state response.
Zhang F; Boettcher FA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jan; 19(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 18637411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of the frequency of interaural time difference in the human brain.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
Neuroreport; 2006 Apr; 17(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 16543815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does mismatch negativity reflect auditory motion?
Altman JA; Vaitulevich SP; Shestopalova LB; Petropavlovskaia EA
Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):194-201. PubMed ID: 20542103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mismatch negativity on the cone of confusion.
Röttger S; Schröger E; Grube M; Grimm S; Rübsamen R
Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 414(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 17223265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus that are sensitive to interaural delays of amplitude-modulated tones: evidence for dual binaural influences.
Batra R; Kuwada S; Stanford TR
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 8395589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
