These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24709484)

  • 1. "Yummy" versus "Yucky"! Explicit and implicit approach-avoidance motivations towards appealing and disgusting foods.
    Piqueras-Fiszman B; Kraus AA; Spence C
    Appetite; 2014 Jul; 78():193-202. PubMed ID: 24709484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of implicit wanting in relation to explicit liking and wanting for food: implications for appetite control.
    Finlayson G; King N; Blundell J
    Appetite; 2008 Jan; 50(1):120-7. PubMed ID: 17655972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is it possible to dissociate 'liking' and 'wanting' for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure.
    Finlayson G; King N; Blundell JE
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jan; 90(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17052736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When hunger does (or doesn't) increase unhealthy and healthy food consumption through food wanting: The distinctive role of impulsive approach tendencies toward healthy food.
    Cheval B; Audrin C; Sarrazin P; Pelletier L
    Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():99-107. PubMed ID: 28455261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Food reward. What it is and how to measure it.
    Rogers PJ; Hardman CA
    Appetite; 2015 Jul; 90():1-15. PubMed ID: 25728883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Approach-avoidance tendencies towards food: Measurement on a touchscreen and the role of attention and food craving.
    Meule A; Lender A; Richard A; Dinic R; Blechert J
    Appetite; 2019 Jun; 137():145-151. PubMed ID: 30851311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motivational state modulates the hedonic value of food images differently in men and women.
    Stoeckel LE; Cox JE; Cook EW; Weller RE
    Appetite; 2007 Mar; 48(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 17034902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explicit and implicit approach vs. avoidance tendencies towards high vs. low calorie food cues in patients with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls.
    Paslakis G; Kühn S; Schaubschläger A; Schieber K; Röder K; Rauh E; Erim Y
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():171-179. PubMed ID: 27496787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre- and postprandial variation in implicit attention to food images reflects appetite and sensory-specific satiety.
    Davidson GR; Giesbrecht T; Thomas AM; Kirkham TC
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():24-31. PubMed ID: 29407747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-response compatibility tests of implicit preference for food and body image to identify people at risk for disordered eating: a validation study.
    Khan S; Petróczi A
    Eat Behav; 2015 Jan; 16():54-63. PubMed ID: 25464068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit wanting and explicit liking are markers for trait binge eating. A susceptible phenotype for overeating.
    Finlayson G; Arlotti A; Dalton M; King N; Blundell JE
    Appetite; 2011 Dec; 57(3):722-8. PubMed ID: 21896296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motivation modulates the effect of approach on implicit preferences.
    Zogmaister C; Perugini M; Richetin J
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Aug; 30(5):890-911. PubMed ID: 25948057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit approach-avoidance associations for craved food cues.
    Kemps E; Tiggemann M; Martin R; Elliott M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 23421423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Easy to get, difficult to avoid: Behavioral tendencies toward high-calorie and low-calorie food during a mobile approach-avoidance task interact with body mass index and hunger in a community sample.
    Collantoni E; Meregalli V; Granziol U; Gerunda C; Zech H; Schroeder PA; Tenconi E; Cardi V; Meneguzzo P; Martini M; Marzola E; Abbate-Daga G; Favaro A
    Appetite; 2023 Sep; 188():106619. PubMed ID: 37268275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pleasantness of a sweet taste during hunger and satiety: effects of gender and "sweet tooth".
    Laeng B; Berridge KC; Butter CM
    Appetite; 1993 Dec; 21(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 8141596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit and explicit attitudes to high- and low-calorie food in females with different BMI status.
    Czyzewska M; Graham R
    Eat Behav; 2008 Aug; 9(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 18549989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alliesthesia is greater for odors of fatty foods than of non-fat foods.
    Plailly J; Luangraj N; Nicklaus S; Issanchou S; Royet JP; Sulmont-Rossé C
    Appetite; 2011 Dec; 57(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 21801771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relational information moderates approach-avoidance instruction effects on implicit evaluation.
    Van Dessel P; De Houwer J; Smith CT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():137-143. PubMed ID: 28433196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Valence and arousal-based affective evaluations of foods.
    Woodward HE; Treat TA; Cameron CD; Yegorova V
    Eat Behav; 2017 Jan; 24():26-33. PubMed ID: 27978493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of state-based changes in wanting and liking.
    Stevenson RJ; Francis HM; Hughes A; Wylie F; Yeomans MR
    Appetite; 2023 Sep; 188():106640. PubMed ID: 37343599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.