161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24709524)
1. Micromotion of cementless tibial baseplates: keels with adjuvant pegs offer more stability than pegs alone.
Bhimji S; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1503-6. PubMed ID: 24709524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Anterior Spike Decreases Bone-Implant Micromotion in Cementless Tibial Baseplates for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study.
Quevedo Gonzalez FJ; Lipman JD; Sculco PK; Sculco TP; De Martino I; Wright TM
J Arthroplasty; 2024 May; 39(5):1323-1327. PubMed ID: 38000515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Micromotion of cementless tibial baseplates under physiological loading conditions.
Bhimji S; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):648-54. PubMed ID: 21831575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
Hu B; Chen Y; Zhu H; Wu H; Yan S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):666-674. PubMed ID: 27776898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Central cone design demonstrates greater micromotion compared to keel design in cementless tibial baseplates: A biomechanical analysis.
Luo TD; Sogbein OA; MacDonald BM; Masse JA; Willing RT; Lanting BA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38713877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design.
Miller AJ; Stimac JD; Smith LS; Feher AW; Yakkanti MR; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1089-1093. PubMed ID: 29275115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Fixation and Subsidence Profiles of Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Implants.
Yildirim G; Gopalakrishnan A; Davignon RA; Parker JW; Chawla H; Pearle AD
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2019-24. PubMed ID: 27004680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial Stability of Cemented vs Cementless Tibial Components Under Cyclic Load.
Crook PD; Owen JR; Hess SR; Al-Humadi SM; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2556-2562. PubMed ID: 28433426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomised controlled trial of cemented and uncemented tibial baseplates: functional and radiological outcomes.
Awwad GEH; Ahedi H; Angadi D; Kandhari V; Coolican MRJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Sep; 143(9):5891-5899. PubMed ID: 37000266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary Stability in Cementless Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Small SR; Rogge RD; Reyes EM; Seale RB; Elliott JB; Malinzak RA
J Knee Surg; 2021 Jan; 34(2):192-199. PubMed ID: 31394587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing tibial baseplate fixation with or without screws in total knee arthroplasty: a radiographic evaluation.
Schepers A; Cullingworth L; van der Jagt DR
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Mar; 27(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 21621958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do porous tantalum implants help preserve bone?: evaluation of tibial bone density surrounding tantalum tibial implants in TKA.
Harrison AK; Gioe TJ; Simonelli C; Tatman PJ; Schoeller MC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Oct; 468(10):2739-45. PubMed ID: 20066524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Axial and Sagittal Rotation of Cementless Tibial Baseplates Occurs in Bone Under Joint Loading.
Teeter MG; Broberg JS; Howard JL; Lanting BA
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1166-1171. PubMed ID: 36893992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cementless vs Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Behery OA; Kearns SM; Rabinowitz JM; Levine BR
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1510-1515. PubMed ID: 28082042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions.
Chong DY; Hansen UN; Amis AA
J Biomech; 2010 Apr; 43(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 20189576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of varus alignment on the bone-implant interaction of a cementless tibial baseplate during gait.
Glenday JD; Wright TM; Lipman JD; Sculco PK; Mayman DJ; Vigdorchik JM; Quevedo-Gonzalez FJ
J Orthop Res; 2022 Apr; 40(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 34231249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2193-8. PubMed ID: 27172865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?
Hanzlik JA; Day JS; Rimnac CM; Kurtz SM;
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1073-8. PubMed ID: 25743106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micromotion Analysis of Various Tibial Constructs in Moderate Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Alipit V; Kirk A; Scholl D; Schmidig G; Springer BD; Lee GC
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):362-367.e1. PubMed ID: 32798182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty with a porous tantalum monoblock tibial component.
Hayakawa K; Date H; Tsujimura S; Nojiri S; Yamada H; Nakagawa K
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 23871406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
