395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24709539)
1. Hydrothermal carbonization and torrefaction of grape pomace: a comparative evaluation.
Pala M; Kantarli IC; Buyukisik HB; Yanik J
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jun; 161():255-62. PubMed ID: 24709539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agro-industrial waste to solid biofuel through hydrothermal carbonization.
Basso D; Patuzzi F; Castello D; Baratieri M; Rada EC; Weiss-Hortala E; Fiori L
Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt A):114-21. PubMed ID: 26031328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of spent liquor recirculation in hydrothermal carbonization.
Kabadayi Catalkopru A; Kantarli IC; Yanik J
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Feb; 226():89-93. PubMed ID: 28006737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemical, structural and combustion characteristics of carbonaceous products obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of palm empty fruit bunches.
Parshetti GK; Kent Hoekman S; Balasubramanian R
Bioresour Technol; 2013 May; 135():683-9. PubMed ID: 23127830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of hydrothermal carbonization and coupling washing with torrefaction of bamboo sawdust for biofuels production.
Zhang S; Su Y; Xu D; Zhu S; Zhang H; Liu X
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jun; 258():111-118. PubMed ID: 29524685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fuel properties and combustion kinetics of hydrochar prepared by hydrothermal carbonization of bamboo.
Yang W; Wang H; Zhang M; Zhu J; Zhou J; Wu S
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Apr; 205():199-204. PubMed ID: 26826960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydrothermal carbonization of municipal waste streams.
Berge ND; Ro KS; Mao J; Flora JR; Chappell MA; Bae S
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(13):5696-703. PubMed ID: 21671644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Torrefaction of agriculture straws and its application on biomass pyrolysis poly-generation.
Chen Y; Yang H; Yang Q; Hao H; Zhu B; Chen H
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Mar; 156():70-7. PubMed ID: 24486935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The pelletization and combustion properties of torrefied Camellia shell via dry and hydrothermal torrefaction: A comparative evaluation.
Tu R; Jiang E; Yan S; Xu X; Rao S
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Sep; 264():78-89. PubMed ID: 29787884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the environmental impact of energy production from hydrochar generated via hydrothermal carbonization of food wastes.
Berge ND; Li L; Flora JR; Ro KS
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():203-17. PubMed ID: 26049203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influences of feedstock type and process variables on hydrochar properties.
Toptas Tag A; Duman G; Yanik J
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Feb; 250():337-344. PubMed ID: 29182991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of solid content and maximum temperature on the performance of a hydrothermal carbonization reactor.
Zabaleta I; Marchetti P; Lohri CR; Zurbrügg C
Environ Technol; 2017 Nov; 38(22):2856-2865. PubMed ID: 28067116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of manure feedstock, slow pyrolysis, and hydrothermal temperature on manure thermochemical and combustion properties.
Zhou S; Liang H; Han L; Huang G; Yang Z
Waste Manag; 2019 Apr; 88():85-95. PubMed ID: 31079653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of liquid and vapor hydrothermal carbonization of corn husk for the use as a solid fuel.
Minaret J; Dutta A
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():804-11. PubMed ID: 26584229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pyrolysis of hydrochar from digestate: Effect of hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis temperatures on pyrochar formation.
Garlapalli RK; Wirth B; Reza MT
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 220():168-174. PubMed ID: 27567477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of products from hydrothermal carbonization of orange pomace including anaerobic digestibility of process liquor.
Erdogan E; Atila B; Mumme J; Reza MT; Toptas A; Elibol M; Yanik J
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 196():35-42. PubMed ID: 26226579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrothermal carbonization of waste from leather processing and feasibility of produced hydrochar as an alternative solid fuel.
Lee J; Hong J; Jang D; Park KY
J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 247():115-120. PubMed ID: 31234046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hydrothermal carbonization of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes: Role of process parameters on hydrochar properties.
Volpe M; Goldfarb JL; Fiori L
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jan; 247():310-318. PubMed ID: 28950140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synergistic effect of hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge with fruit and agricultural wastes on hydrochar fuel quality and combustion behavior.
He C; Zhang Z; Ge C; Liu W; Tang Y; Zhuang X; Qiu R
Waste Manag; 2019 Dec; 100():171-181. PubMed ID: 31541922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of solvent and feedstock selection on primary and secondary chars produced via hydrothermal carbonization of food wastes.
Pecchi M; Baratieri M; Goldfarb JL; Maag AR
Bioresour Technol; 2022 Mar; 348():126799. PubMed ID: 35122980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
