BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24710437)

  • 1. Relative stopping power measurements to aid in the design of anthropomorphic phantoms for proton radiotherapy.
    Grant RL; Summers PA; Neihart JL; Blatnica AP; Sahoo N; Gillin MT; Followill DS; Ibbott GS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4523. PubMed ID: 24710437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of x ray computed tomography number to proton relative linear stopping power conversion functions using a standard phantom.
    Moyers MF
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061705. PubMed ID: 24877800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic lung phantom commissioning for 4D dose assessment in proton therapy.
    Kostiukhina N; Palmans H; Stock M; Georg D; Knäusl B
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(23):235001. PubMed ID: 31652424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the proton range accuracy and optimization of CT calibration curves utilizing range probing.
    Meijers A; Free J; Wagenaar D; Deffet S; Knopf AC; Langendijk JA; Both S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(3):03NT02. PubMed ID: 31896099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An anthropomorphic multimodality (CT/MRI) head phantom prototype for end-to-end tests in ion radiotherapy.
    Gallas RR; Hünemohr N; Runz A; Niebuhr NI; Jäkel O; Greilich S
    Z Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 25(4):391-399. PubMed ID: 26189015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
    Zhu J; Penfold SN
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment.
    Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical Note: CT calibration for proton treatment planning by cross-calibration with proton CT data.
    Farace P; Tommasino F; Righetto R; Fracchiolla F; Scaringella M; Bruzzi M; Civinini C
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 33382083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
    Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
    Rana S; Zheng Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodology paper: a novel phantom setup for commissioning of scanned ion beam delivery and TPS.
    Jäkel O; Ackermann B; Ecker S; Ellerbrock M; Heeg P; Henkner K; Winter M
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 May; 14(1):77. PubMed ID: 31072382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
    Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gel dosimetry for three dimensional proton range measurements in anthropomorphic geometries.
    Hillbrand M; Landry G; Ebert S; Dedes G; Pappas E; Kalaitzakis G; Kurz C; Würl M; Englbrecht F; Dietrich O; Makris D; Pappas E; Parodi K
    Z Med Phys; 2019 May; 29(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 30249351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Schneider U; Pedroni E; Lomax A
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Jan; 41(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 8685250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical characterization of therapeutic proton delivery through common dental materials.
    Hu YH; Wan Chan Tseung HS; Mundy DW
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2904-2913. PubMed ID: 35276753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel approach to Verify air gap and SSD for proton radiotherapy using surface imaging.
    Wang X; Ma C; Davis R; Parikh RR; Jabbour SK; Haffty BG; Yue NJ; Nie K; Zhang Y
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):224. PubMed ID: 31829246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
    Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing.
    Taylor PA; Kry SF; Alvarez P; Keith T; Lujano C; Hernandez N; Followill DS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):242-248. PubMed ID: 27084644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification.
    Bencomo JA; Chu C; Tello VM; Cho SH; Ibbott GS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 15753932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
    Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.