171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24710978)
1. Mutual information as a measure of image quality for 3D dynamic lung imaging with EIT.
Crabb MG; Davidson JL; Little R; Wright P; Morgan AR; Miller CA; Naish JH; Parker GJ; Kikinis R; McCann H; Lionheart WR
Physiol Meas; 2014 May; 35(5):863-79. PubMed ID: 24710978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D EIT image reconstruction with GREIT.
Grychtol B; Müller B; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):785-800. PubMed ID: 27203184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
Wagenaar J; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tracking boundary movement and exterior shape modelling in lung EIT imaging.
Biguri A; Grychtol B; Adler A; Soleimani M
Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1119-35. PubMed ID: 26007150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images.
Adler A; Arnold JH; Bayford R; Borsic A; Brown B; Dixon P; Faes TJ; Frerichs I; Gagnon H; Gärber Y; Grychtol B; Hahn G; Lionheart WR; Malik A; Patterson RP; Stocks J; Tizzard A; Weiler N; Wolf GK
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S35-55. PubMed ID: 19491438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uniform background assumption produces misleading lung EIT images.
Grychtol B; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):579-93. PubMed ID: 23718942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reliability of noninvasive stroke volume monitoring via ECG-gated 3D electrical impedance tomography in healthy volunteers.
Braun F; Proença M; Adler A; Riedel T; Thiran JP; Solà J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191870. PubMed ID: 29373611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrode placement configurations for 3D EIT.
Graham BM; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S29-44. PubMed ID: 17664643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design of a microscopic electrical impedance tomography system for 3D continuous non-destructive monitoring of tissue culture.
Lee EJ; Wi H; McEwan AL; Farooq A; Sohal H; Woo EJ; Seo JK; Oh TI
Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Oct; 13():142. PubMed ID: 25286865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Realistic forward and inverse model mesh generation for rapid three-dimensional thoracic electrical impedance imaging.
Zifan A; Liatsis P; Almarzouqi H
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Apr; 107():97-108. PubMed ID: 30798220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved resolution of D-bar images of ventilation using a Schur complement property and an anatomical atlas.
Santos TBR; Nakanishi RM; de Camargo EDLB; Amato MBP; Kaipio JP; Lima RG; Mueller JL
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4653-4670. PubMed ID: 35411573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element implementation of Maxwell's equations for image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
Soni NK; Paulsen KD; Dehghani H; Hartov A
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 16398414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of individualized electrical impedance tomography and image reconstruction settings upon the assessment of regional ventilation distribution: Comparison to 4-dimensional computed tomography in a porcine model.
Thürk F; Boehme S; Mudrak D; Kampusch S; Wielandner A; Prosch H; Braun C; Toemboel FPR; Hofmanninger J; Kaniusas E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182215. PubMed ID: 28763474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
Boyle A; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new algorithm to reconstruct EIT images: Node-Back-Projection Algorithm.
Zhang J; Yan W; Xu G; Zhao Q
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4390-3. PubMed ID: 18002977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
