151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24711121)
41. Central venous access port placement by translumbar approach using angio-CT unit in patients with superior vena cava syndrome.
Kariya S; Nakatani M; Maruyama T; Ono Y; Ueno Y; Komemushi A; Tanigawa N
Jpn J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):450-455. PubMed ID: 29744732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Radio-opacity and incidental identified mechanical complications of totally implantable venous access devices placed in the chest.
Surov A; Rusner C; Weigand K; John E; Spielmann RP; Behrmann C
Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23028172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.
Schenck M; Schneider T; Rübben H; Eisenhardt A
World J Urol; 2012 Jun; 30(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21874511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Ultrasound visualization of the guidewire and positioning of the central venous catheter : A prospective observational study].
Zick G; Eimer C; Renner J; Becher T; Kott M; Schädler D; Weiler N; Elke G
Anaesthesist; 2020 Jul; 69(7):489-496. PubMed ID: 32409857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Selection of case studies describing PICC tip malposition.
Jackson A; Buttle A
Br J Nurs; 2016 Jul; 25(14):S28-32. PubMed ID: 27467653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Chest radiograph-based algorithm for managing malfunctioning ports.
Nadolski G; Shlansky-Goldberg RD; Stavropoulos SW; Soulen MC; Farrelly C; Trerotola SO
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1337-42. PubMed ID: 23973022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.
Kawamura J; Nagayama S; Nomura A; Itami A; Okabe H; Sato S; Watanabe G; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 13(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 18704637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava: Unusual Catheter Position on Chest X-ray Film.
Deshpande R; Band M; Kurup V
Anesthesiology; 2017 Jul; 127(1):165. PubMed ID: 28187019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Persistent left superior vena cava: a reason for pseudodisplacement of a port catheter.
Schiffmann L; Kruschewski M; Wacker F; Buhr HJ
Surg Radiol Anat; 2003 Apr; 25(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 12677464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Perforation of the Superior Vena Cava Secondary to the Left Subclavian Dialysis Catheter.
Turkyilmaz A; Karapolat S; Kilic M; Tekinbas C
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2017 Feb; 51(2):95-97. PubMed ID: 28118795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of Intravenous Electrocardiography Confirmation of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Parenteral Nutrition.
Mundi MS; Edakkanambeth Varayil J; McMahon MT; Okano A; Vallumsetla N; Bonnes SL; Andrews JC; Hurt RT
Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Apr; 31(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 26850037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Use of a dual lumen port for automated red cell exchange in adults with sickle cell disease.
Shrestha A; Jawa Z; Koch KL; Rankin AB; Xiang Q; Padmanabhan A; Karafin MS; Field JJ
J Clin Apher; 2015 Dec; 30(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 25790325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.
Taxbro K; Hammarskjöld F; Thelin B; Lewin F; Hagman H; Hanberger H; Berg S
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 122(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 31005243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Totally implanted central venous access devices inserted by the femoral route: A narrative review and the proposal of a novel approach, the FICC-port.
Annetta MG; Marche B; Ortiz Miluy G; Pittiruti M
J Vasc Access; 2024 May; ():11297298241236816. PubMed ID: 38708819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cephalad origin of the superior vena cava and the level of the central venous catheter tip on chest radiographs.
Arai T; Yamashita M
Paediatr Anaesth; 2005 Jan; 15(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 15649163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Management of Port Occlusions in Adults: Different-Site Replacement versus Same-Site Salvage.
Pabon-Ramos WM; Soyinka O; Smith TP; Ronald J; Suhocki PV; Kim CY
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1069-1074. PubMed ID: 31133452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Recurrent spontaneous dislocation of the catheter in a venous vascular access port system].
Zák P; Maisnar V; Lojík A; Tauchman M
Vnitr Lek; 1998 Jan; 44(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 9750480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Pre-measured length using landmarks on posteroanterior chest radiographs for placement of the tip of a central venous catheter in the superior vena cava.
Lee JB; Lee YM
J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 20233522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comparative analysis of infection and complication rates between single- and double-lumen ports.
Kozlowski KM; Jalaeian H; Travis LM; Zikria JF
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 45(6):698-702. PubMed ID: 38272652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
