These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24711486)

  • 1. The Temporal Cascade of Neural Processes Underlying Target Detection and Attentional Processing During Auditory Search.
    Gamble ML; Woldorff MG
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Sep; 25(9):2456-65. PubMed ID: 24711486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. N2ac: an ERP component associated with the focusing of attention within an auditory scene.
    Gamble ML; Luck SJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1057-68. PubMed ID: 21261633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid Context-based Identification of Target Sounds in an Auditory Scene.
    Gamble ML; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1675-84. PubMed ID: 25848684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.
    Fitzgerald K; Provost A; Todd J
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28972671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transient spatial attention modulates distinct components of the auditory ERP.
    Tata MS; Prime DJ; McDonald JJ; Ward LM
    Neuroreport; 2001 Dec; 12(17):3679-82. PubMed ID: 11726773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tracking the voluntary control of auditory spatial attention with event-related brain potentials.
    Störmer VS; Green JJ; McDonald JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 19170950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomical substrates of auditory selective attention: behavioral and electrophysiological effects of posterior association cortex lesions.
    Woods DL; Knight RT; Scabini D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1993 Dec; 1(4):227-40. PubMed ID: 8003922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli.
    Mandal A; Liesefeld AM; Liesefeld HR
    J Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 44(30):. PubMed ID: 38886058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pre-attentive spectro-temporal feature processing in the human auditory system.
    Zaehle T; Jancke L; Herrmann CS; Meyer M
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Sep; 22(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 19266276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes.
    Escera C; Corral MJ; Yago E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 12421656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of task-switching on neural representations of ambiguous sound input.
    Sussman ES; Bregman AS; Lee WW
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():218-29. PubMed ID: 25281308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological correlates of cocktail-party listening.
    Lewald J; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():157-66. PubMed ID: 26092714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.