These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24712561)

  • 21. Use of listening strategies for the speech of individuals with dysarthria and cerebral palsy.
    Hustad KC; Dardis CM; Kramper AJ
    Augment Altern Commun; 2011 Mar; 27(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 21355809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of familiarization on intelligibility and lexical segmentation in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria.
    Liss JM; Spitzer SM; Caviness JN; Adler C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3022-30. PubMed ID: 12509024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. English Consonant Identification in Multi-Talker Babble: Effects of Chinese-Native Listeners' English Experience.
    Tao S; Chen Y; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    Lang Speech; 2019 Sep; 62(3):531-545. PubMed ID: 30070165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A relationship between processing speech in noise and dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; Baese-Berk M; Van Engen K; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4660. PubMed ID: 28679257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Phonetic Complexity-Based Approach for Intelligibility and Articulatory Precision Testing: A Preliminary Study on Talkers With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
    Kuruvilla-Dugdale M; Custer C; Heidrick L; Barohn R; Govindarajan R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 61(9):2205-2214. PubMed ID: 30208408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K; Smiljanić R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
    Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
    Narne VK; Barman A; Deepthi M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cognitive-perceptual examination of remediation approaches to hypokinetic dysarthria.
    McAuliffe MJ; Kerr SE; Gibson EM; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1268-83. PubMed ID: 24687031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of reduced vowel working space on speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy.
    Liu HM; Tsao FM; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jun; 117(6):3879-89. PubMed ID: 16018490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A closer look at transcription intelligibility for speakers with dysarthria: evaluation of scoring paradigms and linguistic errors made by listeners.
    Hustad KC
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2006 Aug; 15(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 16896176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
    Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association between objective measurement of the speech intelligibility of young people with dysarthria and listener ratings of ease of understanding.
    Landa S; Pennington L; Miller N; Robson S; Thompson V; Steen N
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 Aug; 16(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 25011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.