These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24712561)

  • 41. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
    Atagi E; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Aircraft noise and speech intelligibility in an outdoor living space.
    Alvarsson JJ; Nordström H; Lundén P; Nilsson ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3455-62. PubMed ID: 24907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults?
    Lu Z; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2655-2677. PubMed ID: 27566326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Combining degradations: The effect of background noise on intelligibility of disordered speech.
    Yoho SE; Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):281. PubMed ID: 29390797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Construct-related validity of the TOCS measures: comparison of intelligibility and speaking rate scores in children with and without speech disorders.
    Hodge MM; Gotzke CL
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():51-63. PubMed ID: 25069811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptual-phonetic predictors of single-word intelligibility: a study of Cantonese dysarthria.
    Whitehill TL; Ciocca V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 43(6):1451-65. PubMed ID: 11193965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparing Lexical Cues in Listener Processing of Dysarthria and Speech in Noise.
    Fletcher A; McAuliffe M
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jun; 30(3S):1572-1579. PubMed ID: 33630661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1906-16. PubMed ID: 12002873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of speech stimuli and dysarthria severity on intelligibility scores and listener confidence ratings for speakers with cerebral palsy.
    Hustad KC
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(6):306-17. PubMed ID: 17965573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Generalized Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech.
    Borrie SA; Lansford KL; Barrett TS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3110-3117. PubMed ID: 29075754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Intelligibility in Down syndrome: Effect of measurement method and listener experience.
    O'Leary D; Lee A; O'Toole C; Gibbon F
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 May; 56(3):501-511. PubMed ID: 33783924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Automatic Assessment of Intelligibility in Noise in Parkinson Disease: Validation Study.
    Moya-Galé G; Walsh SJ; Goudarzi A
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e40567. PubMed ID: 36264608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Variability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Speech Intelligibility Scores in Children.
    Hustad KC; Oakes A; Allison K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1695-707. PubMed ID: 26381119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.