These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24712982)

  • 1. Pupillary dynamics reveal computational cost in sentence planning.
    Sevilla Y; Maldonado M; Shalóm DE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24712982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupillary responses to syntactic ambiguity of sentences.
    Schluroff M; Zimmermann TE; Freeman RB; Hofmeister K; Lorscheid T; Weber A
    Brain Lang; 1986 Mar; 27(2):322-44. PubMed ID: 3513899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access.
    Wagner V; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):423-40. PubMed ID: 20192540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conflict and cognitive control during sentence comprehension: recruitment of a frontal network during the processing of Spanish object-first sentences.
    del Río D; Maestú F; López-Higes R; Moratti S; Gutiérrez R; Maestú C; del-Pozo F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):382-91. PubMed ID: 21147136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: evidence from ERPs.
    Ye Z; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():103-15. PubMed ID: 18313650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeating words in sentences: effects of sentence structure.
    Wheeldon LR; Smith MC; Apperly IA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1051-64. PubMed ID: 21517223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Syntactic flexibility and competition in sentence production: the case of English and Russian.
    Myachykov A; Scheepers C; Garrod S; Thompson D; Fedorova O
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1601-19. PubMed ID: 23286507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing the pupil response due to increased cognitive demand: an independent component analysis study.
    Jainta S; Baccino T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20381549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interplay between prosody and syntax in sentence processing: the case of subject- and object-control verbs.
    Bögels S; Schriefers H; Vonk W; Chwilla DJ; Kerkhofs R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):1036-53. PubMed ID: 19445602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing.
    Just MA; Carpenter PA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):310-39. PubMed ID: 8364533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of analogy in children's interpretations of sentences.
    Fisher C
    Cogn Psychol; 1996 Aug; 31(1):41-81. PubMed ID: 8812021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension.
    Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are semantic and syntactic cues inducing the same processes in the identification of word order?
    Casado P; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Fernández-Frías C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):526-43. PubMed ID: 16099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pupil dilation in response preparation.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 18067982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupillometry reveals increased pupil size during indirect request comprehension.
    Tromp J; Hagoort P; Meyer AS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1093-108. PubMed ID: 26110545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.