These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24712982)

  • 21. Why the leash constrains the dog: the impact of semantic associations on sentence production.
    Sass K; Heim S; Sachs O; Theede K; Muehlhaus J; Krach S; Kircher T
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2010; 70(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 21196951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Task demands and sentence comprehension in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.
    Waters GS; Rochon E; Caplan D
    Brain Lang; 1998 May; 62(3):361-97. PubMed ID: 9593615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The cortical dynamics in building syntactic structures of sentences: an MEG study in a minimal-pair paradigm.
    Iijima K; Fukui N; Sakai KL
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1387-96. PubMed ID: 19041723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults.
    Piquado T; Isaacowitz D; Wingfield A
    Psychophysiology; 2010 May; 47(3):560-9. PubMed ID: 20070575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Foggy windows: Pupillary responses during task preparation.
    Trani A; Verhaeghen P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2235-2248. PubMed ID: 30226439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque.
    Erdocia K; Laka I; Mestres-Missé A; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Brain Lang; 2009 Apr; 109(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 19223065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural basis of sentence processing in which incoming words form a sentence.
    Ikuta N; Sugiura M; Inoue K; Sato S; Horie K; Kawashima R
    Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 19240659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attention, working memory, and grammaticality judgment in typical young adults.
    Smith PA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):918-31. PubMed ID: 21106695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance.
    Schipke CS; Knoll LJ; Friederici AD; Oberecker R
    Dev Sci; 2012 Nov; 15(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 23106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Large-scale neural network for sentence processing.
    Cooke A; Grossman M; DeVita C; Gonzalez-Atavales J; Moore P; Chen W; Gee J; Detre J
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):14-36. PubMed ID: 16168473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.
    Chapman LR; Hallowell B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 64(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 33375842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pupillary transient responses to within-task cognitive load variation.
    Wong HK; Epps J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Dec; 137():47-63. PubMed ID: 28110740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between sentence meaning and word order: evidence from structural priming in German.
    Köhne J; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):304-18. PubMed ID: 23786439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization.
    Cubelli R; Paolieri D; Lotto L; Job R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 21261427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The time course of argument reactivation revealed: using the visual world paradigm.
    Koring L; Mak P; Reuland E
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):361-79. PubMed ID: 22475295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.
    Kuchinke L; Võ ML; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17532075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Grammatical gender in German: a case for linguistic relativity?
    Bender A; Beller S; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1821-35. PubMed ID: 21740112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The "subjective" pupil old/new effect: is the truth plain to see?
    Montefinese M; Ambrosini E; Fairfield B; Mammarella N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 23665094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Building up linguistic context in schizophrenia: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Kuperberg GR; Kreher DA; Goff D; McGuire PK; David AS
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Jul; 20(4):442-52. PubMed ID: 16846262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.