191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24713160)
1. A comparison of imputation strategies in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes.
Caille A; Leyrat C; Giraudeau B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2650-2669. PubMed ID: 24713160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oral ivermectin versus malathion lotion for difficult-to-treat head lice.
Chosidow O; Giraudeau B; Cottrell J; Izri A; Hofmann R; Mann SG; Burgess I
N Engl J Med; 2010 Mar; 362(10):896-905. PubMed ID: 20220184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple imputation methods for bivariate outcomes in cluster randomised trials.
DiazOrdaz K; Kenward MG; Gomes M; Grieve R
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3482-96. PubMed ID: 26990655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
Floden L; Bell ML
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials?
Sullivan TR; White IR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2610-2626. PubMed ID: 28034175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in the presence of missing effect modifier data in cluster-randomized trials.
Blette BS; Halpern SD; Li F; Harhay MO
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 May; 33(5):909-927. PubMed ID: 38567439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; DiazOrdaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3092-3109. PubMed ID: 28557022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Missing Data in Alcohol Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes.
Hallgren KA; Witkiewitz K; Kranzler HR; Falk DE; Litten RZ; O'Malley SS; Anton RF;
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 27254113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for incomplete longitudinal binary data.
Yamaguchi Y; Misumi T; Maruo K
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(4):645-667. PubMed ID: 28886277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the whole larger than the sum of its parts? Impact of missing data imputation in economic evaluation conducted alongside randomized controlled trials.
Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W; Kennedy K; Xie F
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Jul; 21(5):717-728. PubMed ID: 32108274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).
Ma J; Thabane L; Kaczorowski J; Chambers L; Dolovich L; Karwalajtys T; Levitt C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19531226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pattern-mixture model approach for handling missing continuous outcome data in longitudinal cluster randomized trials.
Fiero MH; Hsu CH; Bell ML
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4094-4105. PubMed ID: 28783884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
