These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24713497)

  • 1. A program director's guide to the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (former dean's letter) with a database.
    Naidich JB; Grimaldi GM; Lombardi P; Davis LP; Naidich JJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 24713497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical Student Performance Evaluations in 2005: an improvement over the former dean's letter?
    Shea JA; O'Grady E; Morrison G; Wagner BR; Morris JB
    Acad Med; 2008 Mar; 83(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 18316879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between dean's letter rankings and later evaluations by residency program directors.
    Lurie SJ; Lambert DR; Grady-Weliky TA
    Teach Learn Med; 2007; 19(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17594220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the final adjective in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation on determination of applicant desirability.
    Ward MA; Palazzi DL; Lorin MI; Agrawal A; Frankenthal H; Turner TL
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1542922. PubMed ID: 30406730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The meaning of excellence.
    Naidich JB; Lee JY; Hansen EC; Smith LG
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):1121-6. PubMed ID: 17707321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of dean's letters in 1981 and 1992.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren CF; Scott CS; Chu J; Leiden LI
    Acad Med; 1993 Dec; 68(12):905-11. PubMed ID: 8259964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who to Interview? Low Adherence by U.S. Medical Schools to Medical Student Performance Evaluation Format Makes Resident Selection Difficult.
    Boysen-Osborn M; Yanuck J; Mattson J; Toohey S; Wray A; Wiechmann W; Lahham S; Langdorf MI
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Jan; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 28116008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of Student-Generated 'Unique Characteristics' on the Medical Student Performance Evaluation.
    Holloway R; Domack A; Treat R; Roo KD
    WMJ; 2016 Jun; 115(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 27443088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the Medical Student Performance Evaluation to Facilitate Resident Selection.
    Andolsek KM
    Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11):1475-1479. PubMed ID: 27603040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The State of Medical Student Performance Evaluations: Improved Transparency or Continued Obfuscation?
    Hom J; Richman I; Hall P; Ahuja N; Harman S; Harrington R; Witteles R
    Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11):1534-1539. PubMed ID: 26703411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The "good" dean's letter.
    Kiefer CS; Colletti JE; Bellolio MF; Hess EP; Woolridge DP; Thomas KB; Sadosty AT
    Acad Med; 2010 Nov; 85(11):1705-8. PubMed ID: 20881821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardization in the MSPE: Key Tensions for Learners, Schools, and Residency Programs.
    Hauer KE; Giang D; Kapp ME; Sterling R
    Acad Med; 2021 Jan; 96(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 32167965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ranking Practice Variability in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: So Bad, It's "Good".
    Boysen Osborn M; Mattson J; Yanuck J; Anderson C; Tekian A; Fox JC; Harris IB
    Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11):1540-1545. PubMed ID: 27075499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between peer assessment during medical school, dean's letter rankings, and ratings by internship directors.
    Lurie SJ; Lambert DR; Nofziger AC; Epstein RM; Grady-Weliky TA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Jan; 22(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 17351836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National survey of writers of dean's letters for residency applications.
    Leiden LI; Miller GD
    J Med Educ; 1986 Dec; 61(12):943-53. PubMed ID: 3783637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing assessments of medical students' potentials as residents made by the residency directors and deans at two schools.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren CF; Carline J
    Acad Med; 1991 Jun; 66(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 2069654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A follow-up study of the characteristics of dean's letters.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren C; Scott C; Marshall SG; Braddock CH; Sarfaty S
    Acad Med; 2001 Jul; 76(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 11448831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Revised 2017 MSPE: Better, But Not "Outstanding".
    Hook L; Salami AC; Diaz T; Friend KE; Fathalizadeh A; Joshi ART
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):e107-e111. PubMed ID: 30068491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do students' and authors' genders affect evaluations? A linguistic analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations.
    Isaac C; Chertoff J; Lee B; Carnes M
    Acad Med; 2011 Jan; 86(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 21099389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does a comprehensive clinical performance examination relate to ratings on the medical school student performance evaluation?
    Chen HC; Teherani A; O'Sullivan P
    Teach Learn Med; 2011 Jan; 23(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 21240776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.