93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24713501)
1. Digital breast tomosynthesis utilization in the United States: a survey of physician members of the Society of Breast Imaging.
Hardesty LA; Kreidler SM; Glueck DH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):594-9. PubMed ID: 24713501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Utilization in the United States: A Survey of Physician Members of the Society of Breast Imaging.
Hardesty LA; Kreidler SM; Glueck DH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R67-R73. PubMed ID: 27814818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Utilization Updates.
Boroumand G; Teberian I; Parker L; Rao VM; Levin DC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 29570370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in a US Medicaid Population.
Miller JD; Bonafede MM; Herschorn SD; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Fajardo LL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Apr; 14(4):467-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28139412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Implementation: Considerations for Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Bundled Payment Models.
Fleming MM; Hughes DR; Golding LP; McGinty GB; MacFarlane D; Duszak R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):902-907. PubMed ID: 30679104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Workload and transmission data for the installation of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063901. PubMed ID: 23718617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of extent of breast cancer: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography.
Mun HS; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Ruppel PL; Oh HY; Chae EY
Clin Radiol; 2013 Dec; 68(12):1254-9. PubMed ID: 23969151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF
JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Patel BK; Gray RJ; Pockaj BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):W231-W237. PubMed ID: 28379734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Airaldi S; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 138(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 23338763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis.
Lourenco AP; Barry-Brooks M; Baird GL; Tuttle A; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 25247407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
