These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24713585)

  • 1. Diagnostic capacity of the keratoconus match index and keratoconus match probability in subclinical keratoconus.
    Labiris G; Giarmoukakis A; Gatzioufas Z; Sideroudi H; Kozobolis V; Seitz B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 24713585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic capacity of biomechanical indices from a dynamic bidirectional applanation device in pellucid marginal degeneration.
    Labiris G; Giarmoukakis A; Sideroudi H; Song X; Kozobolis V; Seitz B; Gatzioufas Z
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1006-12. PubMed ID: 24774010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical diagnosis of keratoconus: evaluation of the keratoconus match index and the keratoconus match probability.
    Labiris G; Gatzioufas Z; Sideroudi H; Giarmoukakis A; Kozobolis V; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):e258-62. PubMed ID: 23557430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes.
    Reddy JC; Rapuano CJ; Cater JR; Suri K; Nagra PK; Hammersmith KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 24680519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus.
    Kovács I; Miháltz K; Kránitz K; Juhász É; Takács Á; Dienes L; Gergely R; Nagy ZZ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 27026453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staging of keratoconus indices regarding tomography, topography, and biomechanical measurements.
    Goebels S; Eppig T; Wagenpfeil S; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 159(4):733-8. PubMed ID: 25634534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus.
    Demir S; Ortak H; Yeter V; Alim S; Sayn O; Taş U; Sönmez B
    Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1470-4. PubMed ID: 24071809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis.
    Touboul D; Bénard A; Mahmoud AM; Gallois A; Colin J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2144-50. PubMed ID: 21978610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of corneal tomography parameters and biomechanical characteristic in keratoconus detection.
    Ahmadi Hosseini SM; Abolbashari F; Niyazmand H; Sedaghat MR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Feb; 37(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 23910506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Galletti JD; Minguez N; Delrivo M; Fuentes Bonthoux F; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
    Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
    Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of the KISA% index and Scheimpflug tomography in 'normal', 'subclinical', 'keratoconus-suspect' and 'clinically manifest' keratoconus eyes.
    Steinberg J; Aubke-Schultz S; Frings A; Hülle J; Druchkiv V; Richard G; Katz T; Linke SJ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 93(3):e199-207. PubMed ID: 25873278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for detection of form fruste keratoconus.
    Temstet C; Sandali O; Bouheraoua N; Hamiche T; Galan A; El Sanharawi M; Basli E; Laroche L; Borderie V
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):812-20. PubMed ID: 25840306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
    Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes.
    Uçakhan ÖÖ; Cetinkor V; Özkan M; Kanpolat A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jun; 37(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 21596255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.