These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus. Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Hoyte L; Rabbanifard R; Mezzich J; Bassaly R; Downes K Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 23143426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Management of vaginal vault prolapse repair with robotically-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy]. Elliott DS; Chow GK Ann Urol (Paris); 2007 Feb; 41(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17338498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curves and perioperative outcomes of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy on two different da Vinci Oh S; Bae N; Cho HW; Park YJ; Kim YJ; Shin JH J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 36757563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Elliott DS; Frank I; Dimarco DS; Chow GK Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4A Suppl):52S-56S. PubMed ID: 15476652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sacrocolpopexy experience with a novel robotic surgical platform. Sassani JC; Glass Clark S; McGough CE; Shepherd JP; Bonidie M Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3255-3260. PubMed ID: 35312804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of perioperative complications and influencing factors of complications in 1 000 cases of robotic gynecological surgery]. Huang XT; Ji M; Zhao Z; He NN; Li Y; Xu PL; Zhang JF Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]