These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24715870)

  • 21. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as Corrective Surgery for Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Matsukura Y; Yoshii T; Morishita S; Sakai K; Hirai T; Yuasa M; Inose H; Kawabata A; Utagawa K; Hashimoto J; Tomori M; Torigoe I; Yamada T; Kusano K; Otani K; Sumiya S; Numano F; Fukushima K; Tomizawa S; Egawa S; Arai Y; Shindo S; Okawa A
    J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(20):. PubMed ID: 34682860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Tricalcium Phosphate and Iliac Bone Graft Compared With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Local Bone Graft in Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Thailand.
    Tirawanish P; Phisalprapa P; Kositamongkol C; Korwutthikulrangsri E; Ruangchainikom M; Sutipornpalangkul W
    Int J Spine Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interspinous Process (ISP) Devices in Comparison to the Use of Traditional Posterior Spinal Instrumentation.
    Faulkner JE; Khalifeh K; Hara J; Ozgur B
    Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e13886. PubMed ID: 33868850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review.
    Winder MJ; Gambhir S
    J Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 2(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 27683688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shimizu T; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Murata K; Matsuda S
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 33540124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative study on effectiveness of modified-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in treatment of mild to moderate lumbar spondylolisthesis in middle-aged and elderly patients].
    Yang Z; Liu B; Lan H; Ye H; Chen J; Xia H; Zhang Y; Han F
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 May; 34(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 32410419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 25):S692-S700. PubMed ID: 27843688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Propensity Score-Weighted Study.
    Masuda S; Fukasawa T; Takeuchi M; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Murata K; Shimizu T; Matsuda S; Kawakami K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jul; 48(13):901-907. PubMed ID: 36716385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 3):S83-95. PubMed ID: 26904372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.
    Caelers IJMH; de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; Evers SMAA; van Santbrink H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245963. PubMed ID: 33571291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.
    Xu DS; Walker CT; Godzik J; Turner JD; Smith W; Uribe JS
    Ann Transl Med; 2018 Mar; 6(6):104. PubMed ID: 29707553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.
    Agarwal N; Faramand A; Alan N; Tempel ZJ; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 30052150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
    Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Xu DS; Bach K; Uribe JS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E4. PubMed ID: 29290134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative Analysis of Inpatient Opioid Consumption Between Different Surgical Approaches Following Single Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery.
    Zabat MA; Mottole NA; Ashayeri K; Norris ZA; Patel H; Sissman E; Balouch E; Maglaras C; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ; Fischer CR
    Global Spine J; 2023 Oct; 13(8):2508-2515. PubMed ID: 35379014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Complications following single-level interbody fusion procedures: an ACS-NSQIP study.
    Shillingford JN; Laratta JL; Lombardi JM; Mueller JD; Cerpa M; Reddy HP; Saifi C; Fischer CR; Lehman RA
    J Spine Surg; 2018 Mar; 4(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 29732419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Kunder SL; van Kuijk SMJ; Rijkers K; Caelers IJMH; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 28647584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does the Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Approach Significantly Affect Adjacent Segment Mobility?
    Wangsawatwong P; Sawa AGU; Pereira BA; Lehrman JN; Turner JD; Uribe JS; Kelly BP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Nov; 46(21):E1119-E1124. PubMed ID: 34618704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.