209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24716363)
21. The impact factor: the archives breaks from the pack.
Zucker KJ; Cantor JM
Arch Sex Behav; 2006 Feb; 35(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 16502149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Whatever happened to the 50 most frequently cited articles published in AJR?
Bui-Mansfield LT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Sep; 185(3):597-601. PubMed ID: 16120905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Search engines increase online journal use more than open access.
Mayor S
BMJ; 2006 Jun; 332(7554):1353. PubMed ID: 16763243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Revista Española de Cardiología 2006: activity, readership, and scientific impact].
Alfonso F; Segovia J; Heras M; Bermejo J
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1339-44. PubMed ID: 17697667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Most-downloaded abstracts and full-text views in 2005: a top-12 survey.
Acta Radiol; 2006 Dec; 47(10):1005-6. PubMed ID: 17134999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Why is it that Argentinean hepatologists do not publish enough?].
Villamil FG
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2008 Mar; 38(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 18533351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Closing remark to this year's discussion on the significance of impact factor for the evaluation of publication activity].
Spála M
Cas Lek Cesk; 2006; 145(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 17323624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of the impact factor.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [A letter to myself].
Pérez-Castro Ellendt E
Arch Esp Urol; 2005 Jun; 58(5):383-4. PubMed ID: 16078778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production and consumption on nutrition journals indexed in scielo network].
Tomás-Casterá V; Sanz-Valero J; Juan-Quilis V
Nutr Hosp; 2013; 28(3):969-70. PubMed ID: 23848128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [H-index--a good measure of research activity?].
Hagve TA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2011 Dec; 131(24):2494-6. PubMed ID: 22170140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
Schachat AP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Narrower focus may be more efficient.
Wray KB
Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5910):36; author reply 37-8. PubMed ID: 19119198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?
Sala SD; Brooks J
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 18708185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The shifting sands of serials bibliography: titles using the term "peptide".
Jones JH
J Pept Sci; 2006 Aug; 12(8):503-4. PubMed ID: 16847998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Establishing new column to share findings of outstanding scientific research papers published in international periodicals].
You SN; Hou JJ
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 46(8):628. PubMed ID: 17967227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The next step for REDAR: achieving an impact factor].
Fàbregas Julià N
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2004 Apr; 51(4):181-2. PubMed ID: 15168923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Sociology. Survey finds citations growing narrower as journals move online.
Couzin J
Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5887):329. PubMed ID: 18635769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Discussion of the paper of Dr. M. Spála "Impact factor-- good servant, but a bad master"].
Zima T
Cas Lek Cesk; 2006; 145(3):223. PubMed ID: 16634484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact factor of scientific journals.
Marziale MH; Mendes IA
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2002; 10(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 12592845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
