These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information of Erlotinib, Afatinib, and Cisplatin-Pemetrexed for First-Line Treatment of Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States. Ting J; Tien Ho P; Xiang P; Sugay A; Abdel-Sattar M; Wilson L Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):774-82. PubMed ID: 26409604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Budget Impact Analysis of Afatinib for First-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 19 Deletions or Exon 21 Substitution Mutations in a U.S. Health Plan. Graham J; Earnshaw S; Burslem K; Lim J J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Jun; 24(6):544-553. PubMed ID: 29799327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact on the budget of a U.S. health insurance plan. Ramsey SD; Clarke L; Kamath TV; Lubeck D J Manag Care Pharm; 2006; 12(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 16925455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Budget impact model of adding erlotinib to a regimen of gemcitabine for the treatment of locally advanced, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Danese MD; Reyes C; Northridge K; Lubeck D; Lin CY; O'Connor P Clin Ther; 2008 Apr; 30(4):775-84. PubMed ID: 18498925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Erlotinib for the treatment of relapsed non-small cell lung cancer. McLeod C; Bagust A; Boland A; Hockenhull J; Dundar Y; Proudlove C; Davis H; Green J; Macbeth F; Stevenson J; Walley T; Dickson R Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():41-7. PubMed ID: 19567213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-utility and budget impact analyses of gefitinib in second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer from Thai payer perspective. Thongprasert S; Tinmanee S; Permsuwan U Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2012 Mar; 8(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 22369444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cross-market cost comparison of erlotinib versus pemetrexed for first-line maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Nuijten MJ; de Castro Carpeño J; Chouaid C; Vergnenègre A; Grossi F; Bischoff H; Heigener D; Walzer S Lung Cancer; 2012 Jun; 76(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 22153602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and economic review of erlotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer. Yeung K; Carlson JJ Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2012 Aug; 12(4):411-23. PubMed ID: 22971028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Erlotinib or best supportive care for third-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world cost-effectiveness analysis. Cromwell I; van der Hoek K; Malfair Taylor SC; Melosky B; Peacock S Lung Cancer; 2012 Jun; 76(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 22226627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The potential clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacogenomic approaches to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Carlson JJ; Garrison LP; Ramsey SD; Veenstra DL Value Health; 2009; 12(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 18647257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the United Kingdom. Lewis G; Peake M; Aultman R; Gyldmark M; Morlotti L; Creeden J; de la Orden M J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 20233509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of three strategies for second-line erlotinib initiation in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the ERMETIC study part 3. Borget I; Cadranel J; Pignon JP; Quoix E; Coudert B; Westeel V; Dansin E; Madelaine J; Madroszyk A; Friard S; Daniel C; Morin F; Chouaid C; Eur Respir J; 2012 Jan; 39(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 21659409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Budget Impact of Including Necitumumab on the Formulary for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: U.S. Commercial Payer and Medicare Perspectives. Bly CA; Molife C; Brown J; Tawney MK; Carter GC; Cinfio FN; Klein RW J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Jun; 24(6):534-543. PubMed ID: 29799326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-minimisation analysis of erlotinib in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Brazilian perspective. Doral Stefani S; Giorgio Saggia M; Vicino dos Santos EA J Med Econ; 2008; 11(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 19450094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The budget impact of introducing mobocertinib for the postplatinum treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion mutations. Hernandez L; Young M J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2023 Feb; 29(2):172-186. PubMed ID: 36373869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Gefitinib for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Brown T; Boland A; Bagust A; Oyee J; Hockenhull J; Dundar Y; Dickson R; Ramani VS; Proudlove C Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(Suppl. 2):71-9. PubMed ID: 21047494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]