207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24716894)
1. Technology-based innovation for independent living: policy and innovation in the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, and the United States.
Berridge C; Furseth PI; Cuthbertson R; Demello S
J Aging Soc Policy; 2014; 26(3):213-28. PubMed ID: 24716894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Another special relationship? Interactions between health technology policies and health care systems in the United States and the United Kingdom.
Sampat B; Drummond M
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2011 Feb; 36(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 21498797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of gerontechnology for hospitalized frail elderly people: The ALLEGRO hospital-based geriatric living lab.
Noublanche F; Jaglin-Grimonprez C; Sacco G; Lerolle N; Allain P; Annweiler C;
Maturitas; 2019 Jul; 125():17-19. PubMed ID: 31133211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Older adult perceptions of smart home technologies: implications for research, policy & market innovations in healthcare.
Coughlin J; D'Ambrosio LA; Reimer B; Pratt MR
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1810-5. PubMed ID: 18002331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent trends and future prospects for the elderly in Scandinavia.
Daatland SO
J Aging Soc Policy; 1994; 6(1-2):181-97. PubMed ID: 10186857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What the United States can learn about prevention of teenage pregnancy from other developed countries.
Dryfoos J
SIECUS Rep; 1985 Nov; 14(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12280295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context.
Greenhalgh T; Shaw S; Wherton J; Hughes G; Lynch J; A'Court C; Hinder S; Fahy N; Byrne E; Finlayson A; Sorell T; Procter R; Stones R
BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010208. PubMed ID: 26880671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Healthcare technology co-operatives: Innovative about innovation.
Heron NM; Tindale WB
J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):378-81. PubMed ID: 26453035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The changing environment for technological innovation in health care.
Goodman CS; Gelijns AC
Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():267-315. PubMed ID: 11066263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical technology in the United Kingdom.
Stocking B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1988; 4(2):171-83. PubMed ID: 10302487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Health care innovation from a territorial perspective: a call for a new approach].
Costa LS; Gadelha CA; Maldonado J
Rev Saude Publica; 2012 Dec; 46 Suppl 1():59-67. PubMed ID: 23250395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Arts on prescription in Scandinavia: a review of current practice and future possibilities.
Jensen A; Stickley T; Torrissen W; Stigmar K
Perspect Public Health; 2017 Sep; 137(5):268-274. PubMed ID: 27852837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. National policy approaches to social care for elderly people in the United Kingdom and Singapore 1945-2002.
Mehta KK; Briscoe C
J Aging Soc Policy; 2004; 16(1):89-112. PubMed ID: 15040708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathways of health technology diffusion: the United States and low-income countries.
Nandakumar AK; Beswick J; Thomas CP; Wallack SS; Kress D
Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(4):986-95. PubMed ID: 19597196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design for All in Scandinavia - a strong concept.
Bendixen K; Benktzon M
Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt B():248-57. PubMed ID: 23755993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DRG-based hospital payment systems and technological innovation in 12 European countries.
Scheller-Kreinsen D; Quentin W; Busse R
Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1166-72. PubMed ID: 22152189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term care in the United States: policy themes and promising practices.
Lehning AJ; Austin MJ
J Gerontol Soc Work; 2010 Jan; 53(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 20029701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cultivate technology convergence for product innovation.
Wilkinson JM
Med Device Technol; 2006 Apr; 17(3):34-6. PubMed ID: 16736664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond public perceptions of gene technology: community participation in public policy in Australia.
Dietrich H; Schibeci R
Public Underst Sci; 2003 Oct; 12(4):381-401. PubMed ID: 14971401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diffusion of medical technology, local conditions, and technology re-invention: a comparative case study on coronary stenting.
Hashimoto H; Noguchi H; Heidenreich P; Saynina O; Moreland A; Miyazaki S; Ikeda S; Kaneko Y; Ikegami N
Health Policy; 2006 Dec; 79(2-3):221-30. PubMed ID: 16473435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
