These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24717060)

  • 1. Standardising and structuring of robotic surgery curricula: validation and integration of non-technical skills is required.
    Ahmed K; Brunckhorst O
    BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):687-9. PubMed ID: 24717060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
    Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
    BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic surgical simulation.
    Liss MA; McDougall EM
    Cancer J; 2013; 19(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 23528719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity.
    Shamim Khan M; Ahmed K; Gavazzi A; Gohil R; Thomas L; Poulsen J; Ahmed M; Jaye P; Dasgupta P
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):518-23. PubMed ID: 22928639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
    Murphy DG; Sundaram CP
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):713-4. PubMed ID: 24028763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An update and review of simulation in urological training.
    Brewin J; Ahmed K; Challacombe B
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 24316286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology.
    Dulan G; Rege RV; Hogg DC; Gilberg-Fisher KK; Tesfay ST; Scott DJ
    Am J Surg; 2012 Apr; 203(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 22326049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator.
    Seixas-Mikelus SA; Stegemann AP; Kesavadas T; Srimathveeravalli G; Sathyaseelan G; Chandrasekhar R; Wilding GE; Peabody JO; Guru KA
    BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 21029316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy.
    Hung AJ; Shah SH; Dalag L; Shin D; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 25801765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The need to devise a better means of training.
    Joyce AD
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):369. PubMed ID: 23444926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive surgical training: do we need new standards?
    Galfano A; Bocciardi AM
    BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1056-7. PubMed ID: 24283998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.
    Goh AC; Goldfarb DW; Sander JC; Miles BJ; Dunkin BJ
    J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 22099993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotics in urology.
    McGuinness LA; Prasad Rai B
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 May; 100(6_sup):38-44. PubMed ID: 29717888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Training requirements and credentialing for laparoscopic and robotic surgery--what are our responsibilities?
    Schwartz BF
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):828-9. PubMed ID: 19616251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
    Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery.
    Bahler CD; Sundaram CP
    BJU Int; 2015 Jul; 116(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 26123072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training in urological robotic surgery. Future perspectives.
    El Sherbiny A; Eissa A; Ghaith A; Morini E; Marzotta L; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Bianchi G; Rocco B
    Arch Esp Urol; 2018 Jan; 71(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 29336338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Surgery Training: Current Trends and Future Directions.
    Wang RS; Ambani SN
    Urol Clin North Am; 2021 Feb; 48(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 33218588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel Education and Simulation Tools in Urologic Training.
    Childs BS; Manganiello MD; Korets R
    Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Nov; 20(12):81. PubMed ID: 31782033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tracking and assessment of technical skills acquisition among urology residents for open, laparoscopic, and robotic skills over 4 years: is there a trend?
    Menhadji A; Abdelshehid C; Osann K; Alipanah R; Lusch A; Graversen J; Lee J; Quach S; Huynh V; Sidhom D; Gerbatsch I; Landman J; McDougall E
    J Endourol; 2013 Jun; 27(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 23268587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.