These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24717147)

  • 1. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate.
    Durmus B; Tanboga I
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 May; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 24717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
    Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.
    Markovic D; Zivojinovic V; Vucetic M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Sep; 6(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16216093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate.
    Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study.
    Erdem AP; Guven Y; Balli B; Ilhan B; Sepet E; Ulukapi I; Aktoren O
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 21703067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial.
    Huth KC; Hajek-Al-Khatar N; Wolf P; Ilie N; Hickel R; Paschos E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1243-50. PubMed ID: 21842145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth.
    Ruby JD; Cox CF; Mitchell SC; Makhija S; Chompu-Inwai P; Jackson J
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 22502601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Noorollahian H
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Glenny AM; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; (8):CD003220. PubMed ID: 25099759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hyaluronic acid as a pulpotomy material in primary molars: an up to 30 months retrospective study.
    Sezgin BI; Ildes Sezgin GC; Koyuncu Ö; Mentes A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):683. PubMed ID: 38867194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ferric Sulfate and Formocresol pulpotomies in paediatric dental practice. A prospective-retrospective study.
    Olczak-Kowalczyk D; Samul M; Góra J; Gozdowski D; Turska-Szybka A
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2019 Mar; 20(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 30919641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up.
    Sonmez D; Sari S; Cetinbaş T
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 18634926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of ankaferd blood stopper, ferric sulfate, and formocresol as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: A clinical study.
    Ozmen B; Bayrak S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):832-838. PubMed ID: 28791977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth.
    Fei AL; Udin RD; Johnson R
    Pediatr Dent; 1991; 13(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 1843987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up.
    Ibricevic H; al-Jame Q
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 11314410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biodentine
    El Meligy OAES; Alamoudi NM; Allazzam SM; El-Housseiny AAM
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 30612569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long-term follow up.
    Fuks AB; Holan G; Davis JM; Eidelman E
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 9260226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.