These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24717489)

  • 1. Funders punish open-access dodgers.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2014 Apr; 508(7495):161. PubMed ID: 24717489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How one lab challenged a grant rejection and won €5 million.
    Callaway E
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):159-60. PubMed ID: 27075075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH grant limits rile biomedical research community.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7653):142-143. PubMed ID: 28492269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH disclosure rules falter.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7569):300-1. PubMed ID: 26381962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH funds support more than a researcher's own lab.
    Varmus H
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Government health researchers pressed to share data at no charge.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2005 Mar; ():A17. PubMed ID: 16642589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No more third time lucky.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seed money to bring in pioneers.
    Check E
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7133):238-9. PubMed ID: 17361143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The publisher's pushback against NIH's public access and scholarly publishing sustainability.
    Willinsky J
    PLoS Biol; 2009 Jan; 7(1):e30. PubMed ID: 19175295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An unhealthy obsession.
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):7. PubMed ID: 23236611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accountable and transparent.
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7414):5. PubMed ID: 22955581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trump administration halts fetal-tissue research by government scientists.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7760):148. PubMed ID: 31186554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The best-kept secrets to winning grants.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7655):399-402. PubMed ID: 28541333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science agencies prepare for cuts.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):158-9. PubMed ID: 23407517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
    Roy HK
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of NIH funds placed under a spotlight.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7059):601. PubMed ID: 16193003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.