These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24718329)

  • 1. Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR.
    Khan SJ; Ahmad A; Nawaz MS; Hankins NP
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(7):1403-9. PubMed ID: 24718329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Membrane fouling mitigation in different biofilm membrane bioreactors with pre-anoxic tanks for treating mariculture wastewater.
    Wang H; Zhang H; Zhang K; Qian Y; Yuan X; Ji B; Han W
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jul; 724():138311. PubMed ID: 32272414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of biofilm carriers on membrane fouling propensity in moving biofilm membrane bioreactor.
    Jamal Khan S; Zohaib-Ur-Rehman ; Visvanathan C; Jegatheesan V
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jun; 113():161-4. PubMed ID: 22342044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation and bacterial characterization of membrane bioreactors.
    Khan SJ; Parveen F; Ahmad A; Hashmi I; Hankins N
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Aug; 141():2-7. PubMed ID: 23453983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products in moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor.
    Duan L; Jiang W; Song Y; Xia S; Hermanowicz SW
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Nov; 148():436-42. PubMed ID: 24077152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?
    Malaeb L; Le-Clech P; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ayoub GM; Saikaly PE
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5447-63. PubMed ID: 23863390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
    Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study on membrane fouling between membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor and conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Yang W; Syed W; Zhou H
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(5):1021-7. PubMed ID: 24622551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The correlation between biofilm biopolymer composition and membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Luo J; Zhang J; Tan X; McDougald D; Zhuang G; Fane AG; Kjelleberg S; Cohen Y; Rice SA
    Biofouling; 2014 Oct; 30(9):1093-110. PubMed ID: 25367774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of domestic sewage by a metal membrane bioreactor.
    Xie YH; Zhu T; Xu CH; Nozaki T; Furukawa K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 22378009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane fouling of membrane bioreactor coupled with worm reactor.
    Tian Y; Li Z; Chen L; Lu Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Nov; 123():566-73. PubMed ID: 22944491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tracing biofouling to the structure of the microbial community and its metabolic products: a study of the three-stage MBR process.
    Gao D; Fu Y; Ren N
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(17):6680-90. PubMed ID: 24064549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial community developments and biomass characteristics in membrane bioreactors under different organic loadings.
    Wu B; Yi S; Fane AG
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(13):6808-14. PubMed ID: 21531548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment.
    Yun MA; Yeon KM; Park JS; Lee CH; Chun J; Lim DJ
    Water Res; 2006 Jan; 40(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16360189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison study on membrane fouling in a sponge-submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor.
    Deng L; Guo W; Ngo HH; Zhang J; Liang S; Xia S; Zhang Z; Li J
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():69-74. PubMed ID: 24661815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater.
    Liang Z; Das A; Beerman D; Hu Z
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3313-20. PubMed ID: 20371094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of micropollutant removal and fouling reduction in a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system.
    Luo Y; Jiang Q; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Price WE; Wang J; Guo W
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():355-9. PubMed ID: 26031758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Wang Z; Wu Z; Tang S
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2504-12. PubMed ID: 19285331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) and cationic polymer on biofouling mitigation in hybrid MBRs.
    Jamal Khan S; Visvanathan C; Jegatheesan V
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jun; 113():165-8. PubMed ID: 22264429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of polyvinylidene fluoride and PES flat membranes in submerged MBRs to treat domestic wastewater.
    Zhu T; Xie YH; Jiang J; Wang YT; Zhang HJ; Nozaki T
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 19213993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.