These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24718657)

  • 1. Mode Effects in Assessing Cancer Worry and Risk Perceptions: Is Social Desirability Bias at Play?
    Persoskie A; Leyva B; Ferrer RA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 24718657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Just blowing smoke? Social desirability and reporting of intentions to quit smoking.
    Persoskie A; Nelson WL
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2013 Dec; 15(12):2088-93. PubMed ID: 23884318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. You can be too thin (but not too tall): Social desirability bias in self-reports of weight and height.
    Burke MA; Carman KG
    Econ Hum Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(Pt A):198-222. PubMed ID: 28768226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of survey mode on self-reported psychological functioning: Measurement invariance and latent mean comparison across face-to-face and web modes.
    Zager Kocjan G; Lavtar D; Sočan G
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1226-1243. PubMed ID: 35618987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users.
    Macalino GE; Celentano DD; Latkin C; Strathdee SA; Vlahov D
    AIDS Educ Prev; 2002 Oct; 14(5):367-78. PubMed ID: 12413183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys.
    Maguire KB
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3528-33. PubMed ID: 19647362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of survey administration mode on youth mental health measures: Social desirability bias and sensitive questions.
    Rickwood DJ; Coleman-Rose CL
    Heliyon; 2023 Sep; 9(9):e20131. PubMed ID: 37809858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk perceptions and worry about cancer: does gender make a difference?
    McQueen A; Vernon SW; Meissner HI; Rakowski W
    J Health Commun; 2008; 13(1):56-79. PubMed ID: 18307136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of unit nonresponse in multi-mode data collection: A multilevel analysis.
    Berete F; Van der Heyden J; Demarest S; Charafeddine R; Gisle L; Braekman E; Tafforeau J; Molenberghs G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215652. PubMed ID: 31026300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propensity score matching to measure the effect of survey mode on reports of racial and ethnic discrimination in health care.
    Kemmick Pintor JB; McAlpine D; Beebe TJ; Johnson PJ
    Med Care; 2015 May; 53(5):471-6. PubMed ID: 25811630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Web and Telephone Responses From a National HIV and AIDS Survey.
    Jones MK; Calzavara L; Allman D; Worthington CA; Tyndall M; Iveniuk J
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2016 Jul; 2(2):e37. PubMed ID: 27473597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry.
    Han PK; Moser RP; Klein WM
    J Health Commun; 2006; 11 Suppl 1(0 1):51-69. PubMed ID: 16641074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland.
    Latkin CA; Edwards C; Davey-Rothwell MA; Tobin KE
    Addict Behav; 2017 Oct; 73():133-136. PubMed ID: 28511097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absolute and comparative risk perceptions as predictors of cancer worry: moderating effects of gender and psychological distress.
    Zajac LE; Klein WM; McCaul KD
    J Health Commun; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():37-49. PubMed ID: 16641073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparability of epidemiological information between self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires.
    Okamoto K; Ohsuka K; Shiraishi T; Hukazawa E; Wakasugi S; Furuta K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2002 May; 55(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 12007554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis.
    Gnambs T; Kaspar K
    Assessment; 2017 Sep; 24(6):746-762. PubMed ID: 26739360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses to mental health stigma questions: the importance of social desirability and data collection method.
    Henderson C; Evans-Lacko S; Flach C; Thornicroft G
    Can J Psychiatry; 2012 Mar; 57(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 22398001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social Desirability Bias in Pornography-Related Self-Reports: The Role of Religion.
    Rasmussen KR; Grubbs JB; Pargament KI; Exline JJ
    J Sex Res; 2018; 55(3):381-394. PubMed ID: 29220590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures.
    Hebert JR; Clemow L; Pbert L; Ockene IS; Ockene JK
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 7635601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.