434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24718671)
1. Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.
Waller AH; Blankstein R; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2014 May; 16(5):483. PubMed ID: 24718671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging.
Ko SM; Hwang HK; Kim SM; Cho IH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():1-21. PubMed ID: 25809387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Feher A; Sinusas AJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28794138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Karamitsos TD; Leccisotti L; Arnold JR; Recio-Mayoral A; Bhamra-Ariza P; Howells RK; Searle N; Robson MD; Rimoldi OE; Camici PG; Neubauer S; Selvanayagam JB
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probing transmural myocardial perfusion with CMR.
Klocke FJ; Lee DC
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 24433708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive testing: necessary but insufficient.
Douglas PS; Daubert MA
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of regional myocardial oxygenation by magnetic resonance imaging: validation with positron emission tomography.
McCommis KS; Goldstein TA; Abendschein DR; Herrero P; Misselwitz B; Gropler RJ; Zheng J
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19933371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion: going toward an integrated imaging approach.
Petretta M; Costanzo P; Acampa W; Imbriaco M; Ferro A; Filardi PP; Cuocolo A
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Oct; 9(10):977-86. PubMed ID: 18799959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging.
Blankstein R; Di Carli MF
Nat Rev Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 7(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 20212502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac MR perfusion imaging: where we are.
Marano R; Natale L; Chiribiri A; Pirro F; Silvestri V; Coppola G; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 2015 Feb; 120(2):190-205. PubMed ID: 25030969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The role of advanced cardiac imaging methods in coronary artery disease].
Kiraç S
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Jul; 8 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 18611832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Bratis K; Mahmoud I; Chiribiri A; Nagel E
J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 20(5):860-70; quiz 857-9, 871-3. PubMed ID: 23868071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Kidney Transplantation Candidates.
Winther S; Svensson M; Jørgensen HS; Bouchelouche K; Gormsen LC; Pedersen BB; Holm NR; Bøtker HE; Ivarsen P; Bøttcher M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):553-562. PubMed ID: 25869350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study.
Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.
Mordini FE; Haddad T; Hsu LY; Kellman P; Lowrey TB; Aletras AH; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24433707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease).
Hachamovitch R; Nutter B; Hlatky MA; Shaw LJ; Ridner ML; Dorbala S; Beanlands RS; Chow BJ; Branscomb E; Chareonthaitawee P; Weigold WG; Voros S; Abbara S; Yasuda T; Jacobs JE; Lesser J; Berman DS; Thomson LE; Raman S; Heller GV; Schussheim A; Brunken R; Williams KA; Farkas S; Delbeke D; Schoepf UJ; Reichek N; Rabinowitz S; Sigman SR; Patterson R; Corn CR; White R; Kazerooni E; Corbett J; Bokhari S; Machac J; Guarneri E; Borges-Neto S; Millstine JW; Caldwell J; Arrighi J; Hoffmann U; Budoff M; Lima J; Johnson JR; Johnson B; Gaber M; Williams JA; Foster C; Hainer J; Di Carli MF;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):462-74. PubMed ID: 22281249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
