BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24719120)

  • 1. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas: can the revised 2008 staging system predict survival outcome better?
    Yim GW; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2014 May; 55(3):563-9. PubMed ID: 24719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of tumor size as staging variable in the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I leiomyosarcoma: a population-based study.
    Garg G; Shah JP; Liu JR; Bryant CS; Kumar S; Munkarah A; Morris RT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1201-6. PubMed ID: 20940535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive value of FIGO and AJCC staging systems in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Raut CP; Nucci MR; Wang Q; Manola J; Bertagnolli MM; Demetri GD; Morgan JA; Muto MG; Fletcher CD; George S
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Nov; 45(16):2818-24. PubMed ID: 19647426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uterine leiomyosarcoma in asian patients: validation of the revised Federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging system and identification of prognostic classifiers.
    Tan PS; Koh E; Pang C; Ong WS; Ngo L; Soh LT; Quek R; Chay WY; Ho TH; Tay SK; Chew SH; Lim-Tan SK; Khoo-Tan H; Lim SL; Busmanis I; Goh LK; Chia YN; Chia WK; Lim T
    Oncologist; 2012; 17(10):1286-93. PubMed ID: 22829569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is vascular and lymphatic space invasion a main prognostic factor in uterine neoplasms with a sarcomatous component? A retrospective study of prognostic factors of 60 patients stratified by stages.
    Rovirosa A; Ascaso C; Ordi J; Abellana R; Arenas M; Lejarcegui JA; Pahisa J; Puig-Tintoré LM; Mellado B; Armenteros B; Iglesias X; Biete A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Apr; 52(5):1320-9. PubMed ID: 11955745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in 93 patients with uterine sarcoma from 4 centers in Turkey.
    Durnali A; Tokluoğlu S; Özdemir N; Inanç M; Alkiş N; Zengin N; Sönmez ÖU; Küçüköner M;
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(5):1935-41. PubMed ID: 22901150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of current staging systems and a novel staging system for uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Giuntoli RL; Lessard-Anderson CR; Gerardi MA; Kushnir CL; Cliby WA; Metzinger DS; Gostout BS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):869-76. PubMed ID: 23669444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of patients with uterine sarcoma: analysis of 127 patients at a single institution, 1989-2007.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 134(12):1277-87. PubMed ID: 18506484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Old versus new FIGO staging systems in predicting overall survival in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a study of 86 cases.
    Lim D; Wang WL; Lee CH; Dodge T; Gilks B; Oliva E
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 128(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 23153591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prognostic relevance of histological type in uterine sarcomas: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) multivariate analysis of 249 cases.
    Gadducci A; Sartori E; Landoni F; Zola P; Maggino T; Cosio S; Tisi G; Lissoni A; Ferrero AM; Cristofani R
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 12214727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of patients with uterine serous carcinoma using the revised FIGO staging system.
    Seward S; Ali-Fehmi R; Munkarah AR; Semaan A; Al-Wahab ZR; Elshaikh MA; Cote ML; Morris RT; Bandyopadhyay S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 22274544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome and prognosis in uterine sarcoma and malignant mixed Mullerian tumor.
    Burghaus S; Halmen S; Gass P; Mehlhorn G; Schrauder MG; Lux MP; Renner SP; Beckmann MW; Hein A; Thiel FC
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 26711836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic factors for predicting outcome in uterine sarcomas.
    Wolfson AH; Wolfson DJ; Sittler SY; Breton L; Markoe AM; Schwade JG; Houdek PV; Averette HE; Sevin BU; Penalver M
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 8307502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to deal with prognostic factors and radiotherapy results in uterine neoplasms with a sarcomatous component?
    Rovirosa A; Ascaso C; Ordi J; Arenas M; Valduvieco I; Lejarcegui JA; Pahisa J; Torne A; Biete A
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2009 Oct; 11(10):681-7. PubMed ID: 19828411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective analysis of 80 cases with uterine carcinosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma in China, 1988-2007.
    Gao Y; Meng H; Zhang Y; Jiao T; Hui N
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(4):1616-24. PubMed ID: 24817958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems.
    Zivanovic O; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Jacks LM; Zhou Q; Abu-Rustum NR; Soslow RA; Juretzka MM; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Brennan MF; Hensley ML
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(12):2066-72. PubMed ID: 19255317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the FIGO 2009 endometrial cancer staging system more accurately correlate with clinical outcome in different histologies? Revised staging, endometrial cancer, histology.
    Page BR; Pappas L; Cooke EW; Gaffney DK
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 May; 22(4):593-8. PubMed ID: 22343970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
    Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FIGO staging for carcinosarcoma: can the revised staging system predict overall survival?
    Pradhan TS; Stevens EE; Ablavsky M; Salame G; Lee YC; Abulafia O
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 21889193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine sarcoma: a clinicopathological study of 93 cases.
    González-Bosquet E; Martínez-Palones JM; González-Bosquet J; García Jiménez A; Xercavins J
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 9174834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.