212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24719185)
1. Multiscale and multi-modality visualization of angiogenesis in a human breast cancer model.
Cebulla J; Kim E; Rhie K; Zhang J; Pathak AP
Angiogenesis; 2014 Jul; 17(3):695-709. PubMed ID: 24719185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Micro-CT imaging of tumor angiogenesis: quantitative measures describing micromorphology and vascularization.
Ehling J; Theek B; Gremse F; Baetke S; Möckel D; Maynard J; Ricketts SA; Grüll H; Neeman M; Knuechel R; Lederle W; Kiessling F; Lammers T
Am J Pathol; 2014 Feb; 184(2):431-41. PubMed ID: 24262753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-modal imaging of angiogenesis in a nude rat model of breast cancer bone metastasis using magnetic resonance imaging, volumetric computed tomography and ultrasound.
Bäuerle T; Komljenovic D; Berger MR; Semmler W
J Vis Exp; 2012 Aug; (66):e4178. PubMed ID: 22929330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multimodal μCT/μMR based semiautomated segmentation of rat vertebrae affected by mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic metastases.
Hojjat SP; Foltz W; Wise-Milestone L; Whyne CM
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2848-53. PubMed ID: 22559657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A bioimage informatics based reconstruction of breast tumor microvasculature with computational blood flow predictions.
Stamatelos SK; Kim E; Pathak AP; Popel AS
Microvasc Res; 2014 Jan; 91():8-21. PubMed ID: 24342178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-Modality Imaging of Murine Tumor Vasculature-a Feasibility Study.
Zopf LM; Heimel P; Geyer SH; Kavirayani A; Reier S; Fröhlich V; Stiglbauer-Tscholakoff A; Chen Z; Nics L; Zinnanti J; Drexler W; Mitterhauser M; Helbich T; Weninger WJ; Slezak P; Obenauf A; Bühler K; Walter A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Dec; 23(6):874-893. PubMed ID: 34101107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor vasculature.
Degani H; Chetrit-Dadiani M; Bogin L; Furman-Haran E
Thromb Haemost; 2003 Jan; 89(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 12540950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer angiogenesis: a review.
Furman-Haran E; Kelcz F; Degani H
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):47-54. PubMed ID: 12585654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional imaging of the mouse neurovasculature with magnetic resonance microscopy.
Pathak AP; Kim E; Zhang J; Jones MV
PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22643. PubMed ID: 21818357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing breast cancer angiogenesis in vivo: which susceptibility contrast MRI biomarkers are relevant?
Kim E; Cebulla J; Ward BD; Rhie K; Zhang J; Pathak AP
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Oct; 70(4):1106-16. PubMed ID: 23225578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging angiogenesis: perspectives and opportunities in tumour research - a method display.
Pabst AM; Ackermann M; Wagner W; Haberthür D; Ziebart T; Konerding MA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):915-23. PubMed ID: 24518362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional imaging of the angiogenic switch in a transgenic mouse model of human breast cancer by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Consolino L; Longo DL; Dastrù W; Cutrin JC; Dettori D; Lanzardo S; Oliviero S; Cavallo F; Aime S
Int J Cancer; 2016 Jul; 139(2):404-13. PubMed ID: 26941084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography correlates with 3-dimensional fluorescence ultramicroscopy in antiangiogenic therapy of breast cancer xenografts.
Pöschinger T; Renner A; Eisa F; Dobosz M; Strobel S; Weber TG; Brauweiler R; Kalender WA; Scheuer W
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):445-56. PubMed ID: 24598441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multimodal microvascular imaging reveals that selective inhibition of class I PI3K is sufficient to induce an antivascular response.
Sampath D; Oeh J; Wyatt SK; Cao TC; Koeppen H; Eastham-Anderson J; Robillard L; Ho CC; Ross J; Zhuang G; Reslan HB; Vitorino P; Barck KH; Ungersma SE; Vernes JM; Caunt M; Van Bruggen N; Ye W; Vijapurkar U; Meng YJ; Ferrara N; Friedman LS; Carano RA
Neoplasia; 2013 Jul; 15(7):694-711. PubMed ID: 23814482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vascular phenotyping of the invasive front in breast cancer using a 3D angiogenesis atlas.
Bhargava A; Popel AS; Pathak AP
Microvasc Res; 2023 Sep; 149():104555. PubMed ID: 37257688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of magnetic resonance imaging to angiogenesis in breast cancer.
Leach MO
Breast Cancer Res; 2001; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 11300102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longitudinal live animal micro-CT allows for quantitative analysis of tumor-induced bone destruction.
Johnson LC; Johnson RW; Munoz SA; Mundy GR; Peterson TE; Sterling JA
Bone; 2011 Jan; 48(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 20685406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multimodal-3D imaging based on μMRI and μCT techniques bridges the gap with histology in visualization of the bone regeneration process.
Sinibaldi R; Conti A; Sinjari B; Spadone S; Pecci R; Palombo M; Komlev VS; Ortore MG; Tromba G; Capuani S; Guidotti R; De Luca F; Caputi S; Traini T; Della Penna S
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2018 Mar; 12(3):750-761. PubMed ID: 28593731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiscale imaging and computational modeling of blood flow in the tumor vasculature.
Kim E; Stamatelos S; Cebulla J; Bhujwalla ZM; Popel AS; Pathak AP
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 40(11):2425-41. PubMed ID: 22565817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of angiogenesis using micro-computed tomography in a xenograft mouse model of lung cancer.
Savai R; Langheinrich AC; Schermuly RT; Pullamsetti SS; Dumitrascu R; Traupe H; Rau WS; Seeger W; Grimminger F; Banat GA
Neoplasia; 2009 Jan; 11(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 19107231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
