These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24720096)

  • 1. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
    Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
    Street CN; Richardson DC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deception detection from written accounts.
    Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A true denial or a false confession? Assessing veracity of suspects' statements using MASAM and SVA.
    Wojciechowski BW; Gräns M; Lidén M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198211. PubMed ID: 29856813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motivational cues: the role of perceived senders' self-control ability in raters' deception judgements.
    Wu S; Zou H; Cai W; Wang X; Jin S
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 24811883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.
    Santarcangelo M; Cribbie RA; Hubbard AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15209321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing?
    Street CN; Masip J
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 56(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 25707774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting deceptive behaviour after the fact.
    von Hippel W; Baker E; Wilson R; Brin L; Page L
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 26390987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events.
    Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
    Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How humans impair automated deception detection performance.
    Kleinberg B; Verschuere B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103250. PubMed ID: 33450692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Limits of Conscious Deception Detection: When Reliance on False Deception Cues Contributes to Inaccurate Judgments.
    Stel M; Schwarz A; van Dijk E; van Knippenberg A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1331. PubMed ID: 32636787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection.
    Verschuere B; Lin CC; Huismann S; Kleinberg B; Willemse M; Mei ECJ; van Goor T; Löwy LHS; Appiah OK; Meijer E
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 May; 7(5):718-728. PubMed ID: 36941469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated.
    Luke TJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(4):646-671. PubMed ID: 31173537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.