These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24720909)
21. Reviewing for journals: ask not what your profession can do for you but what you can do for your profession. Steers WD J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1597. PubMed ID: 16600708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Publication ethics--responsibility of all]. Staff A; Rørtveit G Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):259. PubMed ID: 20160762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Standards for ethical publication. Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers. Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Your paper has been accepted for publication. Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Open access, scientific integrity and Andrology. Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E Andrology; 2013 Mar; 1(2):175-6. PubMed ID: 23408751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Avoiding errors in the medical literature: an editor's perspective. Waalen J Am J Prev Med; 2013 Nov; 45(5):672-3. PubMed ID: 24139783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers. Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Section Editor's Notebook: Impact Factor--An Analog Metric in a Digital World. Javitt MC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1153-4. PubMed ID: 26587918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Commitment to Publication Quality and Integrity: A Message from the Journal's Editorial Board. Bassat Q; Bose A; Cartledge P; Collins EM; Jullien S; Lanaspa M; Simkiss D; Trehan I J Trop Pediatr; 2018 Oct; 64(5):355-359. PubMed ID: 30060246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review: an inexact but essential part of scientific publishing. Glick M J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):568, 570, 572. PubMed ID: 17473026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Standards in the face of uncertainty--peer review is flawed and under-researched, but the best we have. Mertens S; Baethge C Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Dec; 109(51-52):900-2. PubMed ID: 23372614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review and the nursing literature. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Peer Review - Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity. Masic I Med Arch; 2016 Jun; 70(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 27594739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiology 2016: The Care and Scientific Rigor Used to Process and Evaluate Original Research Manuscripts for Publication. Levine D; Kressel HY Radiology; 2016 Jan; 278(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 26690988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Editors, reviewers and the work of the editorial board. Foster A Vet Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 24(5):477-8. PubMed ID: 24025019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities? Kramer MS Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]