166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24721107)
1. One or two operator technique and quality performance of colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
Paggi S; Rondonotti E; Amato A; Baccarin A; Spinzi G; Radaelli F
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Jul; 46(7):616-20. PubMed ID: 24721107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Dees J; Tytgat KM; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
Gut; 2012 Oct; 61(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 22187070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of colonoscopic performance between medical and nurse endoscopists: a non-inferiority randomised controlled study in Asia.
Hui AJ; Lau JY; Lam PP; Chui AO; Fan AS; Lam TY; Tse YK; Tang RS; Ng SC; Wu JC; Ching JY; Wong MC; Chan FK; Sung J
Gut; 2015 Jul; 64(7):1058-62. PubMed ID: 25524261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy.
Cadoni S; Gallittu P; Sanna S; Fanari V; Porcedda ML; Erriu M; Leung FW
Endoscopy; 2014 Mar; 46(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 24218307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.
de Brouwer EJ; Arbouw ME; van der Zwet WC; van Herwaarden MA; Ledeboer M; Jansman FG; ter Borg F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):835-40. PubMed ID: 22317882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance.
van Doorn SC; van Vliet J; Fockens P; Dekker E
Endoscopy; 2014 Mar; 46(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 24500977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Koo M; Leung FW
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 109(9):1390-400. PubMed ID: 24890443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial.
Pohl H; Bensen SP; Toor A; Gordon SR; Levy LC; Berk B; Anderson PB; Anderson JC; Rothstein RI; MacKenzie TA; Robertson DJ
Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):891-7. PubMed ID: 26126162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ng SC; Tsoi KK; Hirai HW; Lee YT; Wu JC; Sung JJ; Chan FK; Lau JY
Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 107(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 22664471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy.
Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Harrison ME; Leighton JA; Crowell MD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Sep; 76(3):603-8.e1. PubMed ID: 22732876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a new accessory to improve adenoma detection rate? Technical aspects and first clinical experiences.
Lenze F; Beyna T; Lenz P; Heinzow HS; Hengst K; Ullerich H
Endoscopy; 2014 Jul; 46(7):610-4. PubMed ID: 24824090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?
Choung BS; Kim SH; Yoo KB; Seo SY; Kim IH; Lee SO; Lee ST; Kim SW
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 26576553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
Rastogi A; Bansal A; Rao DS; Gupta N; Wani SB; Shipe T; Gaddam S; Singh V; Sharma P
Gut; 2012 Mar; 61(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 21997547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?
Adler A; Pohl H; Papanikolaou IS; Abou-Rebyeh H; Schachschal G; Veltzke-Schlieker W; Khalifa AC; Setka E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Rösch T
Gut; 2008 Jan; 57(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17681999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
