These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24721489)

  • 21. Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?
    Singer A; Yakubovich S; Kroeker AL; Dufault B; Duarte R; Katz A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Nov; 23(6):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27107454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.
    van Rijssen LB; Koerkamp BG; Zwart MJ; Bonsing BA; Bosscha K; van Dam RM; van Eijck CH; Gerhards MF; van der Harst E; de Hingh IH; de Jong KP; Kazemier G; Klaase J; van Laarhoven CJ; Molenaar IQ; Patijn GA; Rupert CG; van Santvoort HC; Scheepers JJ; van der Schelling GP; Busch OR; Besselink MG;
    HPB (Oxford); 2017 Oct; 19(10):919-926. PubMed ID: 28754367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improvement of Care in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Influence of the Introduction of Standardized Structured Reporting for Pathology.
    Sluijter CE; van Workum F; Wiggers T; van de Water C; Visser O; van Slooten HJ; Overbeek LIH; Nagtegaal ID
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 May; 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 31070983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity of anaesthetic complication coding data as a clinical indicator.
    Jones A; Monagle JP; Peel S; Coghlan MW; Malkoutzis V; Groom A
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 May; 36(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 22624647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
    Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the validity of quality indicators for colorectal cancer care.
    Gooiker GA; Kolfschoten NE; Bastiaannet E; van de Velde CJ; Eddes EH; van der Harst E; Wiggers T; Rosendaal FR; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW;
    J Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 108(7):465-71. PubMed ID: 24115008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implementation and first results of a mandatory, nationwide audit on liver surgery.
    van der Werf LR; Kok NFM; Buis CI; Grünhagen DJ; Hoogwater FJH; Swijnenburg RJ; den Dulk M; Dejong KCHC; Klaase JM;
    HPB (Oxford); 2019 Oct; 21(10):1400-1410. PubMed ID: 30926330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical auditing as an instrument to improve care for patients with ovarian cancer: The Dutch Gynecological Oncology Audit (DGOA).
    Baldewpersad Tewarie NMS; van Driel WJ; van Ham M; Wouters MW; Kruitwagen R;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1691-1697. PubMed ID: 33581966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating the scientific basis of quality indicators in colorectal cancer care: A systematic review.
    Keikes L; Koopman M; Tanis PJ; Lemmens VEPP; Punt CJA; van Oijen MGH
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Nov; 86():166-177. PubMed ID: 28988017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Completeness and quality of baseline data and follow-up in cancer registry--an analysis on the example of colorectal cancer].
    Kropf S; Burger E; Radinski I; Ridwelski K; Lippert H; Altendorf-Hofmann A; Bernarding J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2015 May; 140(11):e106-13. PubMed ID: 26080728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Association between eHealth Capabilities and the Quality and Safety of Health Care in the Netherlands: Comparison of HIMSS Analytics EMRAM data with Elsevier's 'The Best Hospitals' data.
    van Poelgeest R; Heida JP; Pettit L; de Leeuw RJ; Schrijvers G
    J Med Syst; 2015 Sep; 39(9):90. PubMed ID: 26242750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influences of hospital information systems, indicator data collection and computation on reported Dutch hospital performance indicator scores.
    Anema HA; Kievit J; Fischer C; Steyerberg EW; Klazinga NS
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Jun; 13():212. PubMed ID: 23758921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do GPs know their patients with cancer? Assessing the quality of cancer registration in Dutch primary care: a cross-sectional validation study.
    Sollie A; Roskam J; Sijmons RH; Numans ME; Helsper CW
    BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e012669. PubMed ID: 27633642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influences of definition ambiguity on hospital performance indicator scores: examples from The Netherlands.
    Anema HA; van der Veer SN; Kievit J; Krol-Warmerdam E; Fischer C; Steyerberg E; Dongelmans DA; Reidinga AC; Klazinga NS; de Keizer NF
    Eur J Public Health; 2014 Feb; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23543677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality indicators of colorectal cancer care in southern Switzerland: results from a population-based study.
    Spitale A; Ortelli L; Mazzucchelli L; Bordoni A
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2017; 147():w14530. PubMed ID: 29185241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An assessment of data quality in a multi-site electronic medical record system in Haiti.
    Puttkammer N; Baseman JG; Devine EB; Valles JS; Hyppolite N; Garilus F; Honoré JG; Matheson AI; Zeliadt S; Yuhas K; Sherr K; Cadet JR; Zamor G; Pierre E; Barnhart S
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Feb; 86():104-16. PubMed ID: 26620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Utility of Electronic Medical Records in Community Rheumatology Practice for Assessing Quality of Care Indicators for Gout: A Feasibility Study.
    Estrada A; Tsao NW; Howren A; Esdaile JM; Shojania K; De Vera MA
    J Clin Rheumatol; 2018 Mar; 24(2):75-79. PubMed ID: 29232325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feasibility of Using Electronic Medical Record Data for Tracking Quality Indicators in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.
    Broberg C; Sklenar J; Burchill L; Daniels C; Marelli A; Gurvitz M
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2015; 10(6):E268-77. PubMed ID: 26239748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Process assessment by automated computation of healthcare quality indicators in hospital electronic health records: a systematic review of indicators.
    Chazard E; Babaousmail D; Schaffar A; Ficheur G; Beuscart R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():867-71. PubMed ID: 25991279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.