These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24721639)
1. Comparing analytic performance criteria: evaluation of HbA1c certification criteria as an example. Rohlfing CL; Parvin CA; Sacks DB; Little RR; Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Jun; 433():259-63. PubMed ID: 24721639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HbA1c: a comparison of NGSP with IFCC transformed values. Dhatt GS; Agarwal MM; Bishawi B Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug; 358(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 16018879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Report on HbA1c Proficiency Testing in Asia in 2012. Umemoto M; Hoshino T; Miyashita T; Tani W; Kuwa K Ann Lab Med; 2015 May; 35(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 25932445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the ARKRAY HA-8190V instrument for HbA van der Hagen EAE; Leppink S; Bokkers K; Siebelder C; Weykamp CW Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 59(5):965-970. PubMed ID: 33554536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical methods for monitoring the relationship between the IFCC reference measurement procedure for hemoglobin A1c and the designated comparison methods in the United States, Japan, and Sweden. Geistanger A; Arends S; Berding C; Hoshino T; Jeppsson JO; Little R; Siebelder C; Weykamp C; Clin Chem; 2008 Aug; 54(8):1379-85. PubMed ID: 18539643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IFCC reference system for measurement of hemoglobin A1c in human blood and the national standardization schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: a method-comparison study. Hoelzel W; Weykamp C; Jeppsson JO; Miedema K; Barr JR; Goodall I; Hoshino T; John WG; Kobold U; Little R; Mosca A; Mauri P; Paroni R; Susanto F; Takei I; Thienpont L; Umemoto M; Wiedmeyer HM; Clin Chem; 2004 Jan; 50(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 14709644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardization and analytical goals for glycated hemoglobin measurement. Braga F; Panteghini M Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1719-26. PubMed ID: 23729573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The national glycohemoglobin standardization program: a five-year progress report. Little RR; Rohlfing CL; Wiedmeyer HM; Myers GL; Sacks DB; Goldstein DE; Clin Chem; 2001 Nov; 47(11):1985-92. PubMed ID: 11673367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care. Little RR; Rohlfing CL; Sacks DB; Clin Chem; 2011 Feb; 57(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 21148304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytic bias among certified methods for the measurement of hemoglobin A1c: a cause for concern? Holmes EW; Erşahin C; Augustine GJ; Charnogursky GA; Gryzbac M; Murrell JV; McKenna KM; Nabhan F; Kahn SE Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Apr; 129(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 18343780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Japanese standard reference material for JDS Lot 2 haemoglobin A1c. I: Comparison of Japan Diabetes Society-assigned values to those obtained by the Japanese and USA domestic standardization programmes and by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry reference laboratories. Tominaga M; Makino H; Yoshino G; Kuwa K; Takei I; Aono Y; Hoshino T; Umemoto M; Shimatsu A; Sanke T; Kuwashima M; Taminato T; Ono J Ann Clin Biochem; 2005 Jan; 42(Pt 1):41-6. PubMed ID: 15802031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Development of the HbA1c international standardization of HbA1c measurement in Japan Diabetes Society]. Kashiwagi A Rinsho Byori; 2013 Jul; 61(7):585-93. PubMed ID: 24205699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of HbA1c analyzers: D-10, Variant II Turbo, Cobas Integra 800, and Afinion AS100]. Lee JY; Hong KS; Cho SE Korean J Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 30(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 20805705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Four HbA1c Point-of-Care Devices Using International Quality Targets: Are They Fit for the Purpose? Lenters-Westra E; English E J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 12(4):762-770. PubMed ID: 29921132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Six of eight hemoglobin A1c point-of-care instruments do not meet the general accepted analytical performance criteria. Lenters-Westra E; Slingerland RJ Clin Chem; 2010 Jan; 56(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 19926777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardization of HbA1c and Optimal Range of Monitoring. Miedema K Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2005; 240():61-72. PubMed ID: 16112961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three of 7 hemoglobin A1c point-of-care instruments do not meet generally accepted analytical performance criteria. Lenters-Westra E; Slingerland RJ Clin Chem; 2014 Aug; 60(8):1062-72. PubMed ID: 24865164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]