These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24722635)

  • 1. Implementing the optimal provision of ecosystem services.
    Polasky S; Lewis DJ; Plantinga AJ; Nelson E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Apr; 111(17):6248-53. PubMed ID: 24722635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection.
    Nieminen E; Kareksela S; Halme P; Kotiaho JS
    Ambio; 2021 Oct; 50(10):1841-1850. PubMed ID: 33825157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generating spatially optimized habitat in a trade-off between social optimality and budget efficiency.
    Drechsler M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):221-225. PubMed ID: 27174366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of conservation payment schemes for species with different range sizes.
    Drechsler M; Smith HG; Sturm A; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Aug; 30(4):894-9. PubMed ID: 26918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow.
    Satake A; Leslie HM; Iwasa Y; Levin SA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.
    Chen X; Lupi F; Viña A; He G; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 20586786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ability of land owners and their cooperatives to leverage payments greater than opportunity costs from conservation contracts.
    Lennox GD; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Jun; 27(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 23692023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current carbon prices do not stack up to much land use change, despite bundled ecosystem service co-benefits.
    Summers DM; Regan CM; Settre C; Connor JD; O'Connor P; Abbott H; Frizenschaf J; van der Linden L; Lowe A; Hogendoorn K; Groom S; Cavagnaro TR
    Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Jun; 27(12):2744-2762. PubMed ID: 33759299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paying for Forest Ecosystem Services: Voluntary Versus Mandatory Payments.
    Roesch-McNally GE; Rabotyagov SS
    Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 57(3):585-600. PubMed ID: 26661136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Landowners' Socio-Cultural Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees in Costa Rican Agricultural Landscapes.
    Leary J; Grimm K; Aslan C; Mark M; Frey S; Bath-Rosenfeld R
    Environ Manage; 2021 May; 67(5):974-987. PubMed ID: 33661346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the return in ecosystem services from investment in public land acquisitions.
    Kovacs K; Polasky S; Nelson E; Keeler BL; Pennington D; Plantinga AJ; Taff SJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e62202. PubMed ID: 23776429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land.
    Yasué M; Kirkpatrick JB; Davison A; Gilfedder L
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 31359092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipating changes in wildlife habitat induced by private forest owners' adaptation to climate change and carbon policy.
    Hashida Y; Withey J; Lewis DJ; Newman T; Kline JD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230525. PubMed ID: 32240191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact.
    Sánchez-Azofeifa GA; Pfaff A; Robalino JA; Boomhower JP
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 17883482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC
    Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia.
    Jack BK; Leimona B; Ferraro PJ
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 18983597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of preference heterogeneity among landowners on spatial conservation prioritization.
    Nielsen ASE; Strange N; Bruun HH; Jacobsen JB
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 27995662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.