These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24722644)

  • 1. Relationship between tumor heterogeneity measured on FDG-PET/CT and pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer.
    Soussan M; Orlhac F; Boubaya M; Zelek L; Ziol M; Eder V; Buvat I
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94017. PubMed ID: 24722644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer.
    Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of
    Önner H; Coskun N; Erol M; Eren Karanis Mİ
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2022; 41(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 34991831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intratumoral heterogeneity in
    Molina-García D; García-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Amo-Salas M; Martínez-González A; Tello-Galán MJ; Soriano-Castrejón Á; Pérez-García VM
    Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 32(6):379-388. PubMed ID: 29869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
    Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
    J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stratifying triple-negative breast cancer prognosis using 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging.
    Yue Y; Cui X; Bose S; Audeh W; Zhang X; Fraass B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 26346756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Koo HR; Park JS; Kang KW; Han W; Park IA; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3314-21. PubMed ID: 25903708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do clinical, histological or immunohistochemical primary tumour characteristics translate into different (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetric and heterogeneity features in stage II/III breast cancer?
    Groheux D; Majdoub M; Tixier F; Le Rest CC; Martineau A; Merlet P; Espié M; de Roquancourt A; Hindié E; Hatt M; Visvikis D
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1682-1691. PubMed ID: 26140849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tumor metabolism and perfusion ratio assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT and DCE-MRI in breast cancer patients: Correlation with tumor subtype and histologic prognostic factors.
    An YS; Kang DK; Jung YS; Han S; Kim TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1365-70. PubMed ID: 25886700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The correlation of
    Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Journal Club: Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in predicting the clinicopathologic subtypes of invasive breast cancer.
    Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Sugie T; Mikami Y; Toi M; Togashi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 25055259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Triple-negative and non-triple-negative invasive breast cancer: association between MR and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging.
    Bolouri MS; Elias SG; Wisner DJ; Behr SC; Hawkins RA; Suzuki SA; Banfield KS; Joe BN; Hylton NM
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 23878283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from ⁶⁸Ga-RGD PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.
    Yoon HJ; Kang KW; Chun IK; Cho N; Im SA; Jeong S; Lee S; Jung KC; Lee YS; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Chung JK; Moon WK
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1534-43. PubMed ID: 24652232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of
    Önner H; Coskun N; Erol M; Karanis MIE
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2021 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 34305044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer.
    Koolen BB; Pengel KE; Wesseling J; Vogel WV; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Vincent AD; Gilhuijs KG; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 23414930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.
    Ueda S; Tsuda H; Asakawa H; Shigekawa T; Fukatsu K; Kondo N; Yamamoto M; Hama Y; Tamura K; Ishida J; Abe Y; Mochizuki H
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 38(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 18407934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer correlates with immunohistochemically defined subtypes.
    Koo HR; Park JS; Kang KW; Cho N; Chang JM; Bae MS; Kim WH; Lee SH; Kim MY; Kim JY; Seo M; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 24097303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of
    Akimoto E; Kadoya T; Kajitani K; Emi A; Shigematsu H; Ohara M; Masumoto N; Okada M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28993056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.