These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24722754)

  • 1. Enhancement of mammographic density measures in breast cancer risk prediction.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Li J; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Jul; 23(7):1314-23. PubMed ID: 24722754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pectoral muscle attenuation as a marker for breast cancer risk in full-field digital mammography.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):985-91. PubMed ID: 25870223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Eriksson M; Li J; Easton D; Hall P; Humphreys K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110690. PubMed ID: 25329322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
    Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
    Vachon CM; Fowler EE; Tiffenberg G; Scott CG; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Heine JJ
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013 Jan; 15(1):R1. PubMed ID: 23289950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
    Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.
    Eng A; Gallant Z; Shepherd J; McCormack V; Li J; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Sep; 16(5):439. PubMed ID: 25239205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
    Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.
    Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Shumak RS; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Done SJ; Yaffe MJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):377-87. PubMed ID: 26518019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volumetric mammographic density: heritability and association with breast cancer susceptibility loci.
    Brand JS; Humphreys K; Thompson DJ; Li J; Eriksson M; Hall P; Czene K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Dec; 106(12):. PubMed ID: 25376863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.
    Kwok SM; Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y; Rickard MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 15377122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes.
    Nickson C; Arzhaeva Y; Aitken Z; Elgindy T; Buckley M; Li M; English DR; Kavanagh AM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013; 15(5):R80. PubMed ID: 24020331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.
    Li J; Szekely L; Eriksson L; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):R114. PubMed ID: 22846386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement.
    Darabi H; Czene K; Zhao W; Liu J; Hall P; Humphreys K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):R25. PubMed ID: 22314178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic Breast Density and Common Genetic Variants in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Lee CP; Choi H; Soo KC; Tan MH; Chay WY; Chia KS; Liu J; Li J; Hartman M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136650. PubMed ID: 26401662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review.
    Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua KC; Min LC; Abraham KT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23270962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.