These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24723005)

  • 1. The role of mechanical impact in action-related auditory attenuation.
    Horváth J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 14(4):1392-406. PubMed ID: 24723005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 23316925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Action-sound coincidence-related attenuation of auditory ERPs is not modulated by affordance compatibility.
    Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Apr; 93(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23298717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No evidence for peripheral mechanism attenuating auditory ERPs to self-induced tones.
    Horváth J; Burgyán A
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jun; 50(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 23551061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Action-related auditory ERP attenuation: Paradigms and hypotheses.
    Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():54-65. PubMed ID: 25843932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attenuation of auditory N2 for self-modulated tones during continuous actions.
    Sugimoto F; Kimura M; Takeda Y
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Nov; 166():108201. PubMed ID: 34653547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Action-related auditory ERP attenuation is not modulated by action effect relevance.
    Neszmélyi B; Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Apr; 161():108029. PubMed ID: 33556451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Violation of identity-specific action-effect prediction increases pupil size and attenuates auditory event-related potentials at P2 latencies when action-effects are behaviorally relevant.
    Lindner E; Desantis A; Cheng FP; Gail A
    Neuroimage; 2024 Aug; 297():120717. PubMed ID: 38971482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention-dependent sound offset-related brain potentials.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 26757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consequences matter: Self-induced tones are used as feedback to optimize tone-eliciting actions.
    Neszmélyi B; Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):904-915. PubMed ID: 28240775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of the supplementary motor area in auditory sensory attenuation.
    Jo HG; Habel U; Schmidt S
    Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Sep; 224(7):2577-2586. PubMed ID: 31312903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discontinuity of early and late event-related brain potentials for selective attention in dichotic listening.
    Ikeda K
    Neuroreport; 2018 Apr; 29(6):495-503. PubMed ID: 29538097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention.
    Timm J; SanMiguel I; Saupe K; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 23281832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation of auditory evoked potentials for hand and eye-initiated sounds.
    Mifsud NG; Beesley T; Watson TL; Whitford TJ
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():61-68. PubMed ID: 27592269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity.
    Alho K; Escera C; Díaz R; Yago E; Serra JM
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3233-7. PubMed ID: 9351649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing expectancy violations during music performance and perception: an ERP study.
    Maidhof C; Vavatzanidis N; Prinz W; Rieger M; Koelsch S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2401-13. PubMed ID: 19702473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.