These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24723577)

  • 1. Modeling the time--varying subjective quality of HTTP video streams with rate adaptations.
    Chen C; Choi LK; de Veciana G; Caramanis C; Heath RW; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 May; 23(5):2206-21. PubMed ID: 24723577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality-of-Experience for Adaptive Streaming Videos: An Expectation Confirmation Theory Motivated Approach.
    Duanmu Z; Ma K; Wang Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30010561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing QoE for Mobile Users by Environment-Aware HTTP Adaptive Streaming.
    Zhang W; He H; Ye S; Wang Z; Zheng Q
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30373253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recurrent and Dynamic Models for Predicting Streaming Video Quality of Experience.
    Bampis CG; Li Z; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jul; 27(7):3316-3331. PubMed ID: 29641409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of Temporal Effects on Subjective Video Quality of Experience.
    Bampis CG; Zhi Li ; Moorthy AK; Katsavounidis I; Aaron A; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Nov; 26(11):5217-5231. PubMed ID: 28742036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning a Continuous-Time Streaming Video QoE Model.
    Ghadiyaram D; Pan J; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 May; 27(5):2257-2271. PubMed ID: 29432105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards Perceptually Optimized Adaptive Video Streaming-A Realistic Quality of Experience Database.
    Bampis CG; Li Z; Katsavounidis I; Huang TY; Ekanadham C; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():5182-5197. PubMed ID: 33877974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A QoE-Oriented Uplink Allocation for Multi-UAV Video Streaming.
    He C; Xie Z; Tian C
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Aug; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 31382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From Whole Video to Frames: Weakly-Supervised Domain Adaptive Continuous-Time QoE Evaluation.
    Li L; Chen P; Lin W; Xu M; Shi G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4937-4951. PubMed ID: 35853054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual Video Quality Prediction Emphasizing Chroma Distortions.
    Chen LH; Bampis CG; Li Z; Sole J; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():1408-1422. PubMed ID: 33332266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing 360 Video Streaming through Salient Content in Head-Mounted Displays.
    Nguyen A; Yan Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competitive equilibrium bitrate allocation for multiple video streams.
    Tiwari M; Groves T; Cosman PC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Apr; 19(4):1009-21. PubMed ID: 20028630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-time Dash Streaming Architecture for Internet of Things Using FBMRWP Model for Medical Videos.
    Kalpana B; Parthasarathy R
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(8):761-768. PubMed ID: 32008543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gaze-Aware Streaming Solutions for the Next Generation of Mobile VR Experiences.
    Lungaro P; Sjoberg R; Valero AJF; Mittal A; Tollmar K
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Apr; 24(4):1535-1544. PubMed ID: 29543171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Background-Modeling-Based Adaptive Prediction for Surveillance Video Coding.
    Zhang X; Huang T; Tian Y; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Feb; 23(2):769-84. PubMed ID: 26270917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of subjective and objective quality assessment of video.
    Seshadrinathan K; Soundararajan R; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1427-41. PubMed ID: 20129861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective quality assessment of MPEG-2 video streams by using CBP neural networks.
    Gastaldo P; Rovetta S; Zunino R
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2002; 13(4):939-47. PubMed ID: 18244489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Dynamic Bit Rate Analysis Technique for Adaptive Video Streaming over HTTP Support.
    Ashok Kumar PM; Arun Raj LN; Jyothi B; Soliman NF; Bajaj M; El-Shafai W
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating Visual and Network Data with Deep Learning for Streaming Video Quality Assessment.
    Margetis G; Tsagkatakis G; Stamou S; Stephanidis C
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcement Learning-Based Adaptive Streaming Scheme with Edge Computing Assistance.
    Kim M; Chung K
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.