These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24724133)

  • 1. Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fit of Metal Copings Cast from Wax Patterns Fabricated by CAD/CAM and Conventional Wax up Techniques.
    Vojdani M; Torabi K; Farjood E; Khaledi A
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2013 Sep; 14(3):118-29. PubMed ID: 24724133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
    Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Li H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 35788274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
    Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
    Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Production tolerance of conventional and digital workflow in the manufacturing of glass ceramic crowns.
    Mahmood DJH; Braian M; Larsson C; Wennerberg A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 30686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns in CAD/CAM and lost-wax techniques in all fabrication stages through replica weighting, triple scanning, and scanning electron microscope.
    Sadr SM; Ahmadi E; Tabatabaei MH; Mohammadi S; Atri F
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Jun; 8(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35187813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Cobalt- Chromium Copings Fabricated by Two Different CAD/CAM Systems (CAD/ Milling, CAD/ Ceramill Sintron).
    Vojdani M; Torabi K; Atashkar B; Heidari H; Torabi Ardakani M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2016 Dec; 17(4):301-308. PubMed ID: 27942545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
    Sarda AS; Bedia SV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of internal and marginal fit of two metal ceramic system - in vitro study.
    V H; Ali S A M; N J; Ifthikar M; Senthil S; Basak D; Huda F; Priyanka
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Dec; 8(12):ZC53-6. PubMed ID: 25654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.
    Azarbal A; Azarbal M; Engelmeier RL; Kunkel TC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 29143397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
    Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
    Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Li H; Xu L; Wang Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.