These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24725612)

  • 1. Implant-abutment interface: a comparison of the ultimate force to failure among narrow-diameter implant systems.
    Imam AY; Moshaverinia A; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 24725612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Force Transmission on Narrow-Body Dental Implants Made of Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium Zirconia Alloy with a Conical Implant-Abutment Connection: An Experimental Pilot Study.
    Nelson K; Schmelzeisen R; Taylor TD; Zabler S; Wiest W; Fretwurst T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 27632261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants.
    Dittmer S; Dittmer MP; Kohorst P; Jendras M; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):510-6. PubMed ID: 21910778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Load to failure of different titanium abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
    Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 26050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
    Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
    Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study.
    Allum SR; Tomlinson RA; Joshi R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 18474061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
    Asvanund P; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter.
    Quek CE; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 17190303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability.
    Michalakis KX; Calvani PL; Muftu S; Pissiotis A; Hirayama H
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 24779947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.