118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24725614)
21. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an orbital and facial defect: a clinical report.
Padmanabhan TV; Mohamed K; Parameswari D; Nitin SK
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 22356269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Direct 3D Printing of Flexible Nasal Prosthesis: Optimized Digital Workflow from Scan to Fit.
Nuseir A; Hatamleh MM; Alnazzawi A; Al-Rabab'ah M; Kamel B; Jaradat E
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 30461125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Integration of laser surface digitizing with CAD/CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses. Part 2: Development of molding techniques for casting prosthetic parts.
Cheah CM; Chua CK; Tan KH
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 14651243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Selective laser sintering technology for customized fabrication of facial prostheses.
Wu G; Zhou B; Bi Y; Zhao Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 18589076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
Chang WG; Vahidi F; Bae KH; Lim BS
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical nasal prosthesis.
Hutcheson PE; Udagama A
J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Jan; 43(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 6927910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fabrication of an auricular prosthesis: a case report.
Prabhu N; Kumar S; Gupta S
Dent Update; 2011; 38(6):414-6, 418. PubMed ID: 21905355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dimensional change in dentures processed in silicone and stone moulds.
Sinclair GF; Clark RK
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Mar; 10(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 12051132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A two-stage impression technique for custom facial prostheses.
Coleman AJ; Schweiger JW; Urquiola J; Tompkins KA
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):370-2. PubMed ID: 7783016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A modified approach of impression technique for fabrication of finger prostheses.
Tripathi S; Singh RD; Chand P; Mishra N; Yadav LK; Singh SV
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 22173643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Creating an adaptable anterior margin for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
Kubon TM
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11552160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Simplified fabrication of orbital prostheses using posterior attachment for the artificial eye.
Shifman A
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jan; 69(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 8455172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A modified technique for fabricating a mirror image wax pattern for an auricular prosthesis.
Gajdhar S; Gajdhar SK; Salakalakonda SR; Vasthare A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 25277032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mastering the impression technique for simple to complex treatments.
Paquette JM; Sheets CG
Dent Today; 2000 Jun; 19(6):68-75. PubMed ID: 12524795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology.
Persson AS; Andersson M; Odén A; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1123-30. PubMed ID: 18336900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Duplication of an existing implant-supported bar for an auricular prosthesis.
Tarica DY; Brajevic FJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):408-9. PubMed ID: 18456053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
