These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24727843)

  • 21. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries.
    Graham PL; Moran JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions III: Synthesizing data from intervention studies using meta-analysis.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Wang C
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():52-63. PubMed ID: 24905996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of between-trial variance in sequential meta-analyses: a simulation study.
    Novianti PW; Roes KC; van der Tweel I
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Jan; 37(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 24321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 May; 17(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 24692250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
    Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Facilitating meta-analyses by deriving relative effect and precision estimates for alternative comparisons from a set of estimates presented by exposure level or disease category.
    Hamling J; Lee P; Weitkunat R; Ambühl M
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):954-70. PubMed ID: 17676579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.
    Sim J; Reid N
    Phys Ther; 1999 Feb; 79(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 10029058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative.
    Poole C; Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 150(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 10472946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation.
    Thiessen Philbrook H; Barrowman N; Garg AX
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 17292016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Four-fold table cell frequencies imputation in meta analysis.
    Di Pietrantonj C
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2299-322. PubMed ID: 16025540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of bivariate random-effects meta-analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes.
    Riley RD; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):78-97. PubMed ID: 16526010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Invited review: Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology.
    St-Pierre NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):741-55. PubMed ID: 11352149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantifying uncertainty in method of moments estimates of the heterogeneity variance in random effects meta-analysis.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):598-616. PubMed ID: 35285063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.