These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24728389)

  • 1. [Development of an Excel spreadsheet for meta-analysis of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons].
    Tobías A; Catalá-López F; Roqué M
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 24728389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses--an overview and application of NetMetaXL.
    Brown S; Hutton B; Clifford T; Coyle D; Grima D; Wells G; Cameron C
    Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; 3():110. PubMed ID: 25267416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of meta-analytic results of indirect, direct, and combined comparisons of drugs for chronic insomnia in adults: a case study.
    Vandermeer BW; Buscemi N; Liang Y; Witmans M
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S166-72. PubMed ID: 17909377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
    Song F; Altman DG; Glenny AM; Deeks JJ
    BMJ; 2003 Mar; 326(7387):472. PubMed ID: 12609941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study.
    Song F; Xiong T; Parekh-Bhurke S; Loke YK; Sutton AJ; Eastwood AJ; Holland R; Chen YF; Glenny AM; Deeks JJ; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4909. PubMed ID: 21846695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.
    Lee AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 24090930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Indirect comparison and network meta-analyses--new tools for the assessment of evidence on the relative efficacy of drugs].
    Peura P; Asseburg C; Turunen J; Purmonen T; Martikainen J
    Duodecim; 2011; 127(9):900-10. PubMed ID: 21648163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis.
    Neyeloff JL; Fuchs SC; Moreira LB
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Jan; 5():52. PubMed ID: 22264277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
    Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
    Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons.
    König J; Krahn U; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5414-29. PubMed ID: 24123165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a spreadsheet for the calculation of new tools to improve the reporting of the results of medical research.
    Shakespeare TP; Gebski VJ; Thiagarajan A; Jay Lu J
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2006 Jun; 31(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 16777786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Network meta-analysis: mixed and indirect treatment comparisons. a new method to the service of clinical epidemiology and public health].
    García-Perdomo HA; Tobías A
    Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica; 2016 Mar; 33(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 27384635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction.
    Catalá-López F; Tobías A; Cameron C; Moher D; Hutton B
    Rheumatol Int; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1489-96. PubMed ID: 24691560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.
    Roever L; Biondi-Zoccai G
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 106(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 27142793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facilitating meta-analyses by deriving relative effect and precision estimates for alternative comparisons from a set of estimates presented by exposure level or disease category.
    Hamling J; Lee P; Weitkunat R; Ambühl M
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):954-70. PubMed ID: 17676579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons.
    Tonin FS; Rotta I; Mendes AM; Pontarolo R
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2017; 15(1):943. PubMed ID: 28503228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis.
    Hartling L; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Jun; 9(2):486-94. PubMed ID: 25404611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.
    Edwards SJ; Clarke MJ; Wordsworth S; Borrill J
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 63(6):841-54. PubMed ID: 19490195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.