These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24728542)
1. Cost-effectiveness of modern mTOR inhibitor based immunosuppression compared to the standard of care after renal transplantation in Germany. Jürgensen JS; Ikenberg R; Greiner RA; Hösel V Eur J Health Econ; 2015 May; 16(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 24728542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modelling study. Woodroffe R; Yao GL; Meads C; Bayliss S; Ready A; Raftery J; Taylor RS Health Technol Assess; 2005 May; 9(21):1-179, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15899149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model. Jones-Hughes T; Snowsill T; Haasova M; Coelho H; Crathorne L; Cooper C; Mujica-Mota R; Peters J; Varley-Campbell J; Huxley N; Moore J; Allwood M; Lowe J; Hyde C; Hoyle M; Bond M; Anderson R Health Technol Assess; 2016 Aug; 20(62):1-594. PubMed ID: 27578428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplant recipients in Germany: a model approach. Jürgensen JS; Arns W; Hass B Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Feb; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 19296139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: systematic review and economic evaluation. Haasova M; Snowsill T; Jones-Hughes T; Crathorne L; Cooper C; Varley-Campbell J; Mujica-Mota R; Coelho H; Huxley N; Lowe J; Dudley J; Marks S; Hyde C; Bond M; Anderson R Health Technol Assess; 2016 Aug; 20(61):1-324. PubMed ID: 27557331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment for Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients in Colombia. Sanmartin D; Tamayo C; Orozco LE; Ordóñez A; Huertas J; Ávila D; Echeverry J; Caicedo M; García P Value Health Reg Issues; 2024 Jul; 42():100983. PubMed ID: 38663057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation: a viable option? Höcker B; Tönshoff B Paediatr Drugs; 2011 Feb; 13(1):49-69. PubMed ID: 21162600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic evaluation of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine and prednisolone in de novo renal transplant recipients. Holmes M; Chilcott J; Walters S; Whitby S; Akehurst R Transpl Int; 2004 May; 17(4):182-7. PubMed ID: 15107971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review and economic model of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplantation in children. Yao G; Albon E; Adi Y; Milford D; Bayliss S; Ready A; Raftery J; Taylor RS Health Technol Assess; 2006 Dec; 10(49):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-157. PubMed ID: 17134597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin in renal transplantation in Italy: cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analyses. Lazzaro C; McKechnie T; McKenna M J Nephrol; 2002; 15(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 12455727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective clinical trial comparing two immunosuppressive regimens, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine, in de novo renal transplant recipients: results at 6 months follow-up. Favi E; Citterio F; Spagnoletti G; Gargiulo A; Delreno F; Romagnoli J; Castagneto M Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1152-5. PubMed ID: 19460503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of sirolimus versus tacrolimus for immunosuppression following renal transplantation in the UK. McEwan P; Dixon S; Baboolal K; Conway P; Currie CJ Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 16445304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of sirolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression after renal transplantation in the United Kingdom. McEwan P; Baboolal K; Conway P; Currie CJ Clin Ther; 2005 Nov; 27(11):1834-46. PubMed ID: 16368455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cost effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil in the first year after primary cadaveric transplant. U.S. Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Sullivan SD; Garrison LP; Best JH J Am Soc Nephrol; 1997 Oct; 8(10):1592-8. PubMed ID: 9335389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost effectiveness of tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin: a 10-year model of renal transplantation outcomes. Orme ME; Jurewicz WA; Kumar N; McKechnie TL Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(17):1263-76. PubMed ID: 14986738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effectiveness and safety of conversion therapy with the combination of sirolimus with low dose cyclosporine in renal transplantation recipients: a five-year clinical observation]. Zhu L; Ding T; Wang XX; Lin ZB; Chen G Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 May; 96(20):1556-61. PubMed ID: 27266681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus therapy with early cyclosporin withdrawal vs. long-term cyclosporin therapy in Australia. Gordois A; Nobes M; Toohey M; Russ G Clin Transplant; 2006; 20(4):526-36. PubMed ID: 16842533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]