These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24728780)
1. Effectiveness of three types of lumbar orthosis for restricting extension motion. Terai T; Yamada H; Asano K; Nawata A; Iwasaki T; Henmi T; Sairyo K Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Jul; 24 Suppl 1():S239-43. PubMed ID: 24728780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of three different types of orthoses on the range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living. Jegede KA; Miller CP; Bible JE; Whang PG; Grauer JN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2346-53. PubMed ID: 21358469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System. Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of 2 different thoracolumbar orthoses on the stability of the spine during various body movements. Kienle A; Saidi S; Oberst M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1082-9. PubMed ID: 23644685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. I. Restriction of gross body motions. Lantz SA; Schultz AB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Oct; 11(8):834-7. PubMed ID: 3810301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Video fluoroscopic analysis of the effects of three commonly-prescribed off-the-shelf orthoses on vertebral motion. Utter A; Anderson ML; Cunniff JG; Kaufman KR; Jelsing EJ; Patrick TA; Magnuson DJ; Maus TP; Yaszemski MJ; Basford JR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(12):E525-9. PubMed ID: 20445478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses. Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of motion restriction and trunk stiffness provided by three thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs). Cholewicki J; Alvi K; Silfies SP; Bartolomei J J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Oct; 16(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 14526195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three lumbar orthoses using motion assessment during task performance. Krag MH; Fox MS J; Haugh LD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2359-67. PubMed ID: 14560084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stabilization of 2-column thoracolumbar fractures with orthoses: a cadaver model. Rubery PT; Brown R; Prasarn M; Small J; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Rechtine G Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E270-5. PubMed ID: 23211532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global spinal motion in subjects with lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: does the grade or type of slip affect global spinal motion? McGregor AH; Cattermole HR; Hughes SP Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 11224864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar region inclination motion in the sagittal and coronal planes. Mjøsund HL; Boyle E; Kjaer P; Mieritz RM; Skallgård T; Kent P BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 28327115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparison study. Askins V; Eismont FJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 9201855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of Adjustable Cervical Orthoses and Modular Cervical Thoracic Orthoses in Restricting Neck Motion: A Comparative In vivo Biomechanical Study. Gao F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(19):E1046-51. PubMed ID: 26076435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar spine flexion and extension extremes of motion in women of different age and racial groups: the WIN Study. Trudelle-Jackson E; Fleisher LA; Borman N; Morrow JR; Frierson GM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(16):1539-44. PubMed ID: 20072092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A semi-rigid thoracolumbar orthosis fitted immediately after spinal surgery : stabilizing effects and patient satisfaction. Goto T; Sakai T; Sugiura K; Manabe H; Tezuka F; Yamashita K; Takata Y; Katoh S; Sairyo K J Med Invest; 2019; 66(3.4):275-279. PubMed ID: 31656288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review. Holla M; Huisman JM; Verdonschot N; Goosen J; Hosman AJ; Hannink G Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 27032640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-joint coordination and the flexion-relaxation phenomenon among adults with low back pain during bending. Ippersiel P; Preuss R; Fillion A; Jean-Louis J; Woodrow R; Zhang Q; Robbins SM Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():164-170. PubMed ID: 33581560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What Type of Orthosis is Optimal for Conservative Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis?: A Biomechanical Analysis. Fujimoto Y; Sakai T; Sairyo K Spine Surg Relat Res; 2020; 4(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 32039301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of a trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force on low back load during level walking in elderly persons. Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Oka H; Iijima S; Ito A; Yasui T; Yozu A Clin Interv Aging; 2016; 11():1589-1597. PubMed ID: 27877028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]