231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24729867)
21. [Research on sintering process of tricalcium phosphate bone tissue engineering scaffold based on three-dimensional printing].
Man X; Suo H; Liu J; Xu M; Wang L
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 37(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 32096384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cobalt-doped bioceramic scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing show enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties for bone repair.
Li J; Zhao C; Liu C; Wang Z; Ling Z; Lin B; Tan B; Zhou L; Chen Y; Liu D; Zou X; Liu W
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Jul; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 34303371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23.
Bhattacharjee A; Jo Y; Bose S
J Mater Chem B; 2023 May; 11(21):4725-4739. PubMed ID: 37171110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 3D porous Ti6Al4V-beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds directly fabricated by additive manufacturing.
Li J; Yuan H; Chandrakar A; Moroni L; Habibovic P
Acta Biomater; 2021 May; 126():496-510. PubMed ID: 33727193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preparation and Characterization of Nanocomposite Scaffolds (Collagen/β-TCP/SrO) for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Goodarzi H; Hashemi-Najafabadi S; Baheiraei N; Bagheri F
Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2019 Jun; 16(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 31205853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mesoporous bioactive glass nanolayer-functionalized 3D-printed scaffolds for accelerating osteogenesis and angiogenesis.
Zhang Y; Xia L; Zhai D; Shi M; Luo Y; Feng C; Fang B; Yin J; Chang J; Wu C
Nanoscale; 2015 Dec; 7(45):19207-21. PubMed ID: 26525451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Increased Osteogenic Potential of Pre-Osteoblasts on Three-Dimensional Printed Scaffolds Compared to Porous Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.
Zamani Y; Amoabediny G; Mohammadi J; Zandieh-Doulabi B; Klein-Nulend J; Helder MN
Iran Biomed J; 2021 Mar; 25(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 33461289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ginger and Garlic Extracts Enhance Osteogenesis in 3D Printed Calcium Phosphate Bone Scaffolds with Bimodal Pore Distribution.
Bose S; Banerjee D; Vu AA
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2022 Mar; 14(11):12964-12975. PubMed ID: 35263096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Novel 3D-bioprinted Porous Nano Attapulgite Scaffolds with Good Performance for Bone Regeneration.
Wang Z; Hui A; Zhao H; Ye X; Zhang C; Wang A; Zhang C
Int J Nanomedicine; 2020; 15():6945-6960. PubMed ID: 33061361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of Silicon Dioxide and Magnesium Oxide on the Printability, Degradability, Mechanical Strength and Bioactivity of 3D Printed Poly (Lactic Acid)-Tricalcium Phosphate Composite Scaffolds.
Harb SV; Kolanthai E; Backes EH; Beatrice CAG; Pinto LA; Nunes ACC; Selistre-de-Araújo HS; Costa LC; Seal S; Pessan LA
Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2024 Feb; 21(2):223-242. PubMed ID: 37856070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Enhanced osteogenesis of honeycomb β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold by construction of interconnected pore structure: An in vivo study.
Lu T; Feng S; He F; Ye J
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2020 Mar; 108(3):645-653. PubMed ID: 31747100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 369Fabrication of 3D gel-printed β-tricalcium phosphate/titanium dioxide porous scaffolds for cancellous bone tissue engineering.
Xulin H; Hu L; Liang Q; Shuhao Y; Haoming W; Chao P; Yamei Z; Hai L; Hua Y; Kainan L
Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(2):673. PubMed ID: 37065658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Collagenous matrix supported by a 3D-printed scaffold for osteogenic differentiation of dental pulp cells.
Fahimipour F; Dashtimoghadam E; Rasoulianboroujeni M; Yazdimamaghani M; Khoshroo K; Tahriri M; Yadegari A; Gonzalez JA; Vashaee D; Lobner DC; Jafarzadeh Kashi TS; Tayebi L
Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 29054688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nano SiO2 and MgO improve the properties of porous β-TCP scaffolds via advanced manufacturing technology.
Gao C; Wei P; Feng P; Xiao T; Shuai C; Peng S
Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Mar; 16(4):6818-30. PubMed ID: 25815597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of MgO, ZnO, SrO, and SiO
Ke D; Tarafder S; Vahabzadeh S; Bose S
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Mar; 96():10-19. PubMed ID: 30606515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional printing akermanite porous scaffolds for load-bearing bone defect repair: An investigation of osteogenic capability and mechanical evolution.
Liu A; Sun M; Yang X; Ma C; Liu Y; Yang X; Yan S; Gou Z
J Biomater Appl; 2016 Nov; 31(5):650-660. PubMed ID: 27585972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vitamin D3 Release from MgO Doped 3D Printed TCP Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.
Jo Y; Majumdar U; Bose S
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2024 Mar; 10(3):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 38386843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of silica and zinc oxide doping on mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed tricalcium phosphate tissue engineering scaffolds.
Fielding GA; Bandyopadhyay A; Bose S
Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 22047943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. SiO2 and ZnO dopants in three-dimensionally printed tricalcium phosphate bone tissue engineering scaffolds enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo.
Fielding G; Bose S
Acta Biomater; 2013 Nov; 9(11):9137-48. PubMed ID: 23871941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fabrication of β-tricalcium phosphate composite ceramic sphere-based scaffolds with hierarchical pore structure for bone regeneration.
He F; Qian G; Ren W; Li J; Fan P; Shi H; Shi X; Deng X; Wu S; Ye J
Biofabrication; 2017 Apr; 9(2):025005. PubMed ID: 28361794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
