BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24730082)

  • 21. Digital mammography: an update.
    Hailey D
    Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Oct; (91):1-4. PubMed ID: 17073037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
    Gur D; Abrams GS; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Perrin RL; Rathfon GY; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Bandos AI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography.
    Svane G; Azavedo E; Lindman K; Urech M; Nilsson J; Weber N; Lindqvist L; Ullberg C
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 21498340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis--initial experiences.
    Tingberg A; Förnvik D; Mattsson S; Svahn T; Timberg P; Zackrisson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):180-3. PubMed ID: 21733859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
    Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast density and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Reynolds A
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(1):63M-82M; quiz 83M-85M. PubMed ID: 24029897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
    Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital mammography: novel applications.
    Rafferty EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 24450669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
    Michielsen K; Nuyts J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast cancer screening: options beyond the mammogram. The mammogram remains the foundation of breast cancer screening, but variations on this test can improve detection for some women.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2014 Jul; 21(11):3. PubMed ID: 25219012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study.
    Svahn T; Andersson I; Chakraborty D; Svensson S; Ikeda D; Förnvik D; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 20228048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF
    JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2).
    Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():98-101. PubMed ID: 28107735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography.
    TEC Bull (Online); 2002 Nov; 19(3):18-27. PubMed ID: 12839023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.