201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24730651)
1. Lateral forces exerted through ball or bar attachments in relation to the inclination of mini-implant underneath overdentures: in vitro study.
Takagaki K; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1060-3. PubMed ID: 24730651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Inclined Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. An In Vitro Study of Loading and Dislodging Strains.
Elhelbawy NG; ELsyad MA; Soliman TA; Mahrous A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):982-988. PubMed ID: 36170313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 2: Palateless Dentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Tomita A; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):357-364. PubMed ID: 29534124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 1. Overdenture with Palate.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1308–1314. PubMed ID: 28938033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Attachment Type on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Part 2. Palateless Overdentures.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 29340347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress distribution of one-piece and two-piece mini-Implant overdentures with various attachment systems and diameters: A finite element analysis.
Trang BNH; Kanazawa M; Murakami N; Wakabayashi N; Hada T; Sahaprom N; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 36372437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Attachment Height and Shape on Lateral Force Transmission in Implant Overdenture Treatment.
Ying Z; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(6):586–591. PubMed ID: 29084305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Attachment Type on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Part 1. Overdenture with Palate.
Takahashi T; Gonda T; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):815-821. PubMed ID: 28708913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of matrix attachment installation load on movement and resultant forces in implant overdentures.
Goto T; Nagao K; Ishida Y; Tomotake Y; Ichikawa T
J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 24975368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
