201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24730651)
21. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Peri-implant tissue health and patient satisfaction of vertical versus inclined posterior implants used to support overdentures with bar attachments. A one-year randomized trial.
Ibrahim CRM; Awad S; Habib AA; Elsyad MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):424-434. PubMed ID: 35704472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures.
Cekiç C; Akça K; Cehreli MC
Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):e291-7. PubMed ID: 17625616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative study to evaluate microstrain of low-profile attachment associated with and without bar connection in implant assisted mandibular overdenture (in vitro study).
Ameen NM; El-Khodary NM; Abdel-Hamid AM; Fahmy AE
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):982. PubMed ID: 38066586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
Petropoulos VC; Smith W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study.
Gotfredsen K; Holm B
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11203620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis.
Chang SH; Huang SR; Huang SF; Lin CL
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(8):911-21. PubMed ID: 26212887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ibrahim AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):381–389. PubMed ID: 30703183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
